12-16-06
During the last year as U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad has given USA Support to Saddam Hussein's Sunni communi$t$. Whether or Not You Understand It, If You are Against Iran and Shiites, You Support communi$m. Zalmay Khalizad is slated to become the next US Ambassador to the United Nations. Logic dictates this USA financed and built Saddam Hussein Sunni communi$t Iraq war machine is on a path to invade Syria, Iran, Turkey on route to invade Russia's heartland. Khalizad, as US Ambassador to the UN, will be working to get the United Nations to give the United States a green light to illegal invasions.
Associated Press NAJAF, Iraq - Anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr (A Sunni Baathist communi$t in Shiite clothing) sharply criticized (Shiite) Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government on Sunday. Iraq's prime minister (Shiite) al-Maliki is coming under mounting pressure to end his alliance with the radical Shiite cleric (Al-Sadr is rally a Baathist Sunni communi$t$) .
Al-Sadr's criticism comes at a time when relations between his Sadrist (Sadrist. is a media made up term to conjure up thoughts of "sadism" for the purpose of slanting public opinion against Shiites.) movement ...
Al-Maliki, himself a Shiite, criticized the Sadrists (Sadist. Sadrist. Media invented term to rhyme sadrist with sadist to slant media coverage against Shiites) for their action, saying it is disloyal to the governing coalition.
Talks under way to replace Iraq PM
By HAMZA HENDAWI and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writers
Sun Dec 10, 6:29 PM ET
The talks are aimed at forming a new parliamentary bloc that would seek to replace
the current government and that would likely exclude supporters of the radical
Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr...
One Associated Press article states al-Sadr is critical of the current Shiite Prime Minister of Iraq Nouri al-Maliki and a block of Iraqi lawmakers want to replace al-Maliki because al-Maliki has an alliance with al-Sadr. This makes no sense. If al-Maliki is a supporter of al-Sadr why would al-Sadr want al-Maliki removed as Prime Minister of Iraq? War is deception. Al-Sadr is being impersonated by Baathist Sunni communi$t$. Al-Maliki is correct when he says al-Sadr is acting in a disloyal manner to Shiites. Logic dictates the reason al-Sadr, a Shiite, is criticizing the Shiite Prime Minister of Iraq, is because al-Sadr is a figurehead, and Baathist Saddam Hussein Sunni communi$t$ are saying things in the name of al-Sadr which in fact al-Sadr is not saying.
The second Associated Press article also is illogical because it states a move is underway to replace Iraq' Prime Minister al-Maliki by forming a new parliamentary bloc that would seek to replace the current government and that would likely exclude supporters of the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr... Also note the use of the media invented term "Sadrist" rhymes with "sadist," getting sexual pleasure from dominating, mistreating, or hurting one's partner. The media deliberately manufactured the term "Sadrist" to slant public opinion against Shiites. In communi$t media propaganda parlance, many times the opposite of what is written is the truth. When the media states the new parliamentary block would exclude al-Sadr supporters the opposite is closer to the truth. Since the so call al-Sadr supporters are really Sunni and Sunni are communi$t$ and Little George has invaded Iraq to spread communi$m logic dictates al-Sadr would gain seats in Iraq's government. Why would al-Sadr want the Shiite Prime Minister replaced if his group would be excluded from the new government?
The fact James Baker III met with Saddam Hussein and Uday and Quisay Hussein's deaths were fraud, their doubles were killed and not them, is worrisome.
Basically everything that has to do with al-Sadr is Neocon USA shadow government fraud. Those people who want to expand communi$m in the Mid East and the United States are using al-Sadr and the Mahdi Army as a tool to do so. When the USA first invaded Iraq, the media depicted Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party and Sunni as bad guys while Saddam Hussein's generals given jo bs.. Now the media is openly slanting news in favor of Saddam Hussein's Sunni communi$t$ and portrays non communi$t Shiites as "sadist" sexual deviates.
A third Associate Press article states
Alluding to al-Maliki's summit with Bush, al-Sadr said: "Yesterday's friends are today's enemies, and yesterday's enemies are today's friends." He also criticized the Iraqi government's widely reported contacts with leaders of Saddam Hussein's outlawed Baath party as part of its efforts to reach national reconciliation.
"Baath has been our enemy. Now it sits to talk with our friends," he said.
"You're the One" is the name of a good country and western song with lyrics which apply to al-Sadr. Al-Sadr's organization is totally and completely infiltrated by Saddam Hussein Sunni communi$t$. It would be massively stupid for al-Maliki not to talk with Little George. It is Zalmay Khalizad, the US Ambassador to Iraq who has been in contact with Saddam Hussein's Sunni communi$t$, not al-Maliki. Any Arab who does not see al-Sadr as Saddam Hussein Sunni in a Shiite uniform is being deceived. Attributing "Baath is our enemy" to al-Sadr is pure deception for Baath is exactly the communi$t Party which has built al-Sadr and put al-Sadr in hiding in a Baath prison.
War is deception is an interesting subject. The Neocons not only must deceive me but Neocons must deceive the Russian KGB, China's secrete service, and every person on the planet. That is a hard job. A shortcut to stay ahead of the Neocon shell game is to remember the Neocons and Little George first and foremost are in the business of spreading communi$m. Sun Tuz says War has no head or tail. On a sticky stuck to my computer are words I found on a military strategy web site, "Seek and you will be deceived." Long ago I enjoyed playing linebacker for five years or so in Junior and Senior High School. My defensive coaches taught me to stay at home. Stay at home. Little George is a fourth generation communi$t and one can take every fake or one can take the road less traveled, stay at home, look for the Neocons' stealing money, i.e., spreading communi$m, and know one is where the communi$t$ are and where the bad guys don't want you to be.
The United States has supplied the Mahdi Army with arms and runs it with US contractors who have staffed the Mahdi Army with Saddam Hussein's Sunni Baathist communi$t generals. Zalmay Khalizad has supplied Sunni terrorists with guns, money, and cover to kill and run Shiite self employed middle class out of Iraq and blame Sunni murdering on The Mahdi Army.
Why does Little George want the USA to attack Iran which is populated by a majority of Shiites? Iran's nuclear weapons? Hogwash. Israel has the biggest nuclear arsenal in the Mid East and the world. (Considering the USA as an Israeli satellite country.) If the USA is really out to stop nuclear proliferation, the USA would attack Israel before it attacked Iran. If Little George does not like Iran's Shiites then Little George does not like Iraq's Shiites. If Little George does not like Iraq's Shiites then Little George likes Saddam Hussein Sunni Baathist communi$t$. Little George says "you are either with us or against us." Using Little George's own philosophy, Little George cannot be against Shiites in Iran and be for Shiites in Iraq.
Little George fails to mention that he is a fourth generation communi$t. Little George has been on the side of Saddam Hussein's Sunni Baathist communi$t$ from day one. The Neocon game plan has always been for USA military forces to hook up with Saddam Hussen's Sunni communi$t$, attack Iran, steal Iran's oil, attack Russia, steal the Caspian Sea oil, and spread communi$m through out the Mid East and then Russia. Whoever controls Russia's heartland rules the world. Nepolian went after Russia's heartland. Hitler went after Russia's heartland. Now Little George the antiChrist is after Russia's heartland.
John Negroponte-Zalmay Khalizad Saddam Hussein Sunni death squads and figurehead for Sunni al-Sadr are brutalizing Shiites. If Shiites were smart they would kill al-Sadr yesterday. Al-Sadr's followers are Sunni and this is why al-Sadr must be killed. If al-Sadr is dead al-Sadr's death will prove he and Shiites are part of the Mahdi Army in name only. With al-Sadr dead the Mahdi Army will be seen as it really is, a Saddam Hussein Baathist Sunni communi$t army which has raised a Shiite false flag. Two years ago or so I stated al-Sadr's operation has been built by and infiltrated by and run by the USA Neocon shadow government and that Shiites must kill Al-Sadr. If Shiites had listened to me two years ago Sunni in al-Sadr clothing would not be around to kick the Shiite PM, al-Maliki, out of office. When people like me demand al-Sadr is killed the Sunni making statements in the name of all-Sadr start talking like Shiites. Shiites don't be fooled this time by al-Sadr's rhetoric, al-Sadr must be eliminated. Try to kill al-Sadr and one will figure out who protects al-Sadr. The US military. If al-Sadr hates the USA so much, why does the USA military keep him alive?
A big first deception by the Neocon Big George communi$t shadow government was September 11, another big Neocon deception is Saddam Hussein Sunni's puppet, al-Sadr.
In a recent article by Gareth Porter, Mr. Porter gives us some disturbing news about the new candidate for US Ambassador to the UN and the last US Ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalizad. Mr. Porter states "Zalmay Khalizad negotiated for several weeks earlier this year a plan that supported Sunni forces attacking Shiite militias,..." "the main objective of the talks was to explore possible U.S. support for building a Sunni military force directed primarily against Shi'ites in Iraq." "If he would just provide us with the weapons, we would kill Shiites and run Shiites out of Baghdad in 30 days," one Saddam Hussein Sunni terrorist leader was quoted as saying. (Isn't this eactly what is happening in Baghdad right now!) The negotiations between Khalilzad and Saddam Hussein Sunni communi$t terrorists were said by the Sunni leaders to have been brokered by former interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, at Khalilzad's request. But in November 2005, Khalilzad began hinting strongly at a shift toward a "Sunni strategy." At the same time, the U.S. command began for the first time referring to the Sunni insurgents as "nationalists" rather than "anti-Iraqi forces." After Allawi's list did badly in the December elections, Khalilzad repeated his insistence that Shi'ites would not be allowed to control the interior ministry. These were all signals aimed primarily at convincing Saddam Hussein Sunni communi$t leaders that Little George was a Saddam Hussein communi$t to the bone and the Sunni communi$t$ could strike a deal with the United States to spread communi$m all over the Mid East. Three major Sunni armed organizations were interested in a possible agreement with the United States: the Army of Ansar al-Sunnah, the 1920 Revolutionary Brigade (an umbrella group for seven smaller organizations), and the Islamic Army of Iraq. The three groups claimed to represent three-fourths of Saddam Hussein's Sunni communi$t forces. On Jan. 17, 2006, the three Saddam Hussein communi$t Sunni commanders met with Khalilzad for the first time in Allawi's villa in Amman, Jordan, according to their account to the Sunday Times. A series of meetings were held over the next two months in Allawi's home in Baghdad, according to their account, including some that stretched over two days. The earlier Sunni account of the talks published in Asharq al-Awsat said there were seven sets of meetings in all. ( Biblically 7 means completion. So a deal was done. Khalizad made a done to supply guns and whatever is needed for Saddam Hussein terrorists to run Shiites out of Baghdad. The killing in Baghdad now and the removal underway now of Shiite al-Maliki as Iraq's Prime Minister is the fruit of the Khalizad Sunni deal.) One of the Saddam Hussein Sunni communi$t terrorist leaders told the Sunday Times Sunnis were in no hurry to see the U.S. forces leave, provided that they were supporting Saddam Hussein communi$t Sunni building a racist military force for the purpose of wiping Shiites off the face of the Earth and spreading communi$m. The Sunni leaders demanded amnesty for terrorists and a Saddam Hussein policy of Shiite cleansing. Khalilzad expressed sympathy for those demands in the talks, they recalled. The Sunni proposal put particular emphasis on the need to put Saddam Sunni communi$t$ in charge of the Ministries of Interior and Defense, so that Sunnis could occupy upper echelons in a Sunni army and Sunni police force.
Recently the media stated the USA sent 500,000 machine guns and pistols to Iraq. For emphasis I say again logic dictates Saddam Hussein Sunni communi$t terrorists did get money, guns, and the support from comrade Khalizad they wanted and Sunni communi$t$ are responsible for the recent surge in mass murders of Iraqi Shiites in Baghdad. comrade Khalizad and Sunni communi$t$ are behind plans to oust Iraq's Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government and replace al-Maliki with a communi$t dictator, CIA hit man and Saddam Hussein comrade Iyad Allawi. The last time the USA named Allawi dictator over Iraq a jubilant Allawi shot six Shiites in the back of the head.
The Neocons are responsible for September 11. Bin Laden was killed in October 2001 to keep his mouth shut. The Neocons are on the same side as Bin Laden and the al-Queda because the Neocons hate the United States, cheer when our brave soldiers die, and support the United States as a communi$t country.
Fortunately
the United States has millions of true Americans who hate Big George's coward
communi$m. February 12 I turn 61 and though I am sickened to the bone of War
Criminal Little George's unAmerican activities, incomprehensible evil and hatred
of the USA, true American heroes are immerging whose courage make me want to
slip on my ML Leddy cowboy boots, put a Neocon's head on the concrete, and with
every ounce of energy I can generate from my 300 pounds, stomp forever.
Never
before have I had a living in my time American hero, but now I have several,
and I don't even know the name of my biggest American hero, the pilot of Flight
93 September 11. What did my greatest American hero do? He figured out a way
to over ride the remote controls the coward Neocons used to fly his plane toward
WTC Building 7 and crashed it in a field in Pennsylvania and prevented his plane
from crashing into WTC Building # 7. Now the world has proof demolition bombs
were detonated in the WTC buildings, because WTC Bldg. 7 was destroyed and became
a pile of rubble and no plane hit it, and the official versions of September
11 are more lies from the Little George "Father of Lies" Administration.
Building to left of TwinTowers with the smoke bellowing from it is WTC Bldg. 7, the demolition bombs Big George's Neocons put in it exploding at the same time the planes hit the Twin Towers at the World Trade Center. Flight 93 was supposed to hit WTC-7 but one of America's greatest heroes' ever, the pilot of Flight 93, made sure that did not happen by over riding the remote controls, and crashed his plane in a field in Pennsylvania, proving Satanic zioni$t communi$t$ are responsible for September 11, and not Arabs.


Why does not Ottie $ulzberger,
owner
of the NYTs, or Craig Moon, publisher of USAToday have their newspapers discuss
the fact 3 buildings were demolished Sept 11?
U.S. anti-drug chief: Afghan poppies
to be sprayed with herbicide
The Associated PressPublished: December 9, 2006
KABUL, Afghanistan: The top U.S. anti-drug official said Saturday that Afghan
poppies would be sprayed with herbicide to combat an opium trade that produced
a record heroin haul this year, a measure likely to anger farmers and scare
Afghans unfamiliar with weed killers.
What is the real reason the USA is in Afghanistan and what is the real reason Afghan poppies are being sprayed with herbicide? No poppies had been raised in Afghanistan for like two years before Little George ordered the USA invade Afghanistan. Poppies are being raised in Afghanistan because the USA wants heroin drug money in Afghanistan. Some Afghan heroin drug money finances the al-Queda,Sunni, who kill USA forces. Why is the USA now supporting the killing of poppies in Afghanistan? Actually Little George only wants the poppies killed in which the money goes to Shiites. Neocons want al-Queda poppy plants to thrive in Afghanistan because al-Queda poppy plants generate drug money which is used to kill our brave soldiers.
Ms Peloski, Have You Read this mess?
Another Reason for Texans to Be Embarrassed
Tuesday, December 12th, 2006 in Terrorism, Islam, Politics by Jeremy Sapienza|
Is this for real?
I’m still incredulous of what I have just read. Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), has been appointed the new chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, on which he has served for the last six years. This is a person you’d expect to be more than basically knowledgeable of the world in which he lives. Well, surprise! You’d expect wrong. Silvestre Reyes just found out last week that al-Qaeda is Sunni, and what Hezbollah is. Actually, I’m not so sure these items were resolved, I just know that when asked, he whined about being asked questions so late in the afternoon.
Here are the schadenfreudelicious tidbits for you all to enjoy:
Al Qaeda is what, I asked, Sunni or Shia?
“Al Qaeda, they have both,” Reyes said. “You’re talking about predominately?”
“Sure,” I said, not knowing what else to say.
“Predominantly — probably Shiite,” he ventured.
Reyes has to have spent six years on the House Intel Committee playing solitaire on his Palm to — wait, no. Reyes has to be a RETARD to not know that al-Qaeda is a Sunni organization. Not only that, his answer — with the “predominantly” in there — makes it obvious that he doesn’t even understand the fanaticism of the likes of al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda is 100% Sunni, there is no minority faction. As the interviewer mentioned, “If a Shiite showed up at an al-Qaeda club house, they’d slice off his head and use it for a soccer ball.”
And Hezbollah? I asked him. What are they?
“Hezbollah. Uh, Hezbollah…”
He laughed again, shifting in his seat.
“Why do you ask me these questions at five o’clock? Can I answer in Spanish? Do you speak Spanish?”
“Poquito,” I said—a little.
“Poquito?! “ He laughed again.
“Go ahead,” I said, talk to me about Sunnis and Shia in Spanish.
Reyes: “Well, I, uh….”
You see, Reyes has apparently never even heard of Hezbollah. You’d think he would have at least known of them from when they blew up the Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, since they have been termed “terrorists” by the US ever since that day.
There is nothing left to conclude except that Reyes has gone to work every day and literally not paid attention for a second to his work. In fact, he can’t even have read a newspaper very many times in the past decade, something over which the Democrats love to pick on the President. This will (hopefully) go down in history lumped with the hilarity of Ted “Tubes” Stevens and the Foley fiasco as proof that the government is staffed not with experts (even in their own fields!) and the pure of heart, but with morons with the right connections who just want to show up and get their check.
Qué vergüenza.
Digg it [what's this?]