Recently I have written regarding the shooting of an AR-15 .223 caliber rifle from the trunk of the car belonging to the guilty DC sniper guilty until proven innocent guys from the state of Washington and I was wondering if ear plugs or ear protection were found among their belongings. If a . 223 caliber weapon was fired from inside the trunk of their vehicle the sound of the bullet firing would be deafening. It would take only one shot from a not too smart sniper from inside a car trunk before the shooter would beat feet somewhere to buy ear protection. If a sniper firing from inside their car trunk did not wear ear protection the next time he fired from within the car's trunk he would jerk when he pulled the trigger of the gun so badly, he might not even hit near where he was aiming. So there should be at least one set of ear protection in the belongings of the assumed guilty snipers and probably two sets of ear protection if they really fired a . 223 caliber rifle out of the trunk of their vehicle.

What does it mean if no ear protection is found among the belonging of the New York times types media asserted as guilty DC snipers, and also what if no dents are marks are found inside the trunk where the snipers are declared to have shot the semiautomatic AR-15 rifle? By the way, has anyone test fired a . 223 AR-15 caliber rifle with the scope through the same size hole as was cut in the trunk of the vehicle used by the declared guilty snipers, in the dark, with and without ear protection, to determine where the spent shells would eject and hit metal inside the trunk, and to determine if it was even possible to fire an AR-15 in this part of the trunk? If no ear protection is found in the belongings of the assumed guilty DC snipers, no dents in the inside of their trunk from spent shells ejecting forcefully, no way to see the victim out of a hole in the trunk too small to allow the rifle barrel and scope to function as required, too dark for the scope to let enough light in to see the cross hairs & the victim to be killed, then why the hole in the trunk with a glove stuck in it, which matches a glove found in the woods where the sniper is alleged to have fired a shot that killed a victim? This is beginning to sound like the same dumb-_asses Big George's Shadow government used to frame OJ were used to set up these assumed guilty DC snipers from the state of Washington. Why have a glove covering up a hole in the trunk of the mobile deer stand type of murder vehicle and have a glove found in the woods? Make up your mind, guys. Did the DC sniper shoot out of their vehicle designed to hide a sniper or did the sniper shoot from woods? It seems to me it may be proven their vehicle with the hole cut in the trunk did not have one little thing to do with the DC sniper murders and the Shadow government got the real snipers, Freeh type thugs, to manipulate the cutting of a hole in the trunk, just like Freeh type thugs manipulate the school kid shootings, to frame the New York times type media declared guilty DC snipers from the state of Washington. Don't make me sneeze. Sneeze, sneeze, sneeze. You dumb_asses. You know Little George does not like me sneezing when I am writing.

If the sniper shot from woods at night with a semi automatic weapon the shell casing would be ejected forcefully and be very difficult, if not impossible, for a nervous sniper who has just killed a person to find instantly. The sniper would need a flash light to find the shell casing. Was a flashlight found among the possessions of the guilty until proven innocent snipers? Was the flashlight working, if found?

Well, maybe, possibly one may say, the scope was taken off the rifle to kill in one type of DC sniper situation, and the scope put back on the rifle and used in another DC sniper killing situation. No work EE. The scope would have to be sighted in and sighting in a scope takes room and a place to shoot the gun which can't be found in DC if you are a nobody. Also the assumed guilty snipers were stopped by police a time or two while in the DC area and this makes me wonder why the AR-15 was not found by the law. AR-15s freak people out. Even before the sniper shooting carrying an AR-15 can cause one trouble unless one is going and coming from a shooting range and can prove it. The thought the assumed guilty snipers carried around an AR-15 for months and no one saw the gun, or people saw the gun & did not freak out, did not tell someone, does not ring true. Also it is now said, after it was stated for a while the Montgomery liquor store robbery murder weapon was a . 223, the murder weapon the DC snipers used to kill the Black lady in Montgomery in a robbery, and the Montgomery/robbery/murder is not the same type of crime as a terrorist type of crime, 15 sniper shootings, in the capitol of the most power nation on Earth, was a . 22 caliber pistol.

By the way, the caliber of a gun, rifle, pistol, is determined by the percentage of an inch of the lead. The lead in . 223 bullet is . .223 per cent of an inch in diameter. A 45 caliber pistol or rifle, its lead is . 45 percent of an inch in diameter. The 9 mm is the diameter of the lead using the metric system. There are three international caliber's, 223,308, and 9 mm. Why would the Montgomery/robber/murderer use a 22 caliber pistol if he has an .223 caliber AR-15 inside his vehicle? Also Muslims are not supposed to kill Blacks. Sounds like our NYtts guilty sniper until proven innocent is not that devout of a Muslim. The Muslim label on one of the DC snipers may be BS & logically could be part of the New York times media propaganda campaign to paint all Arabs as evil, and thus help the US justify the theft of Arab oil & hyperinflation. Remember, if it can be proven ONE of the DC sniper killings was not the evil of the assume guilty DC snipers from the state of Washington, in my opinion, based upon logic, they are not guilty of ANY of the DC SNIPER murders. Because two Black guys go on a killing and robbery spree does not make them the DC sniper killers. They may be the DC snipers, but they may not be. They could be patsies.

Patsies are always a part of Big George's Shadow government killings whether it is Kennedy, September 11, or what ever. Have you ever heard Big George's Shadow government uses the movie industry to help sell their disinformation? The movie Conspiracy Theory said so & mentioned Oliver Stone as a disinformation guy for Big George and I saw a movie by Oliver Stone on Cuba, Scar Face, and about fell over when the movie had picture of the Carlyle Hotel and Scar face laid on us a bunch of info about communism which did not ring true. Anyway I have felt Big George may be out to get the Kennedys' because it is alleged Big George was in charge of Kennedy's murder and he is a coward and afraid Kennedys' will nail his evil one day so logically he would screw Kennedys' every chance he gets, which Big George does, and now this weekend there is a TV movie coming out about that Kennedy kin who was the patsy in the girl murder, and so Big George seems to be up to his old Hitler type propaganda tricks of using the movie industry to sell his lies and lay misinformation on us, the cattle. Just a little diversion.

This is getting a little long and boring so I will look at a couple of don't add ups and be finished. The following paragraphs or lines are from a DC sniper article prominently displayed after I signed on AOL.

Seventeen-year-old John Lee Malvo's fingerprints were the only ones found on the rifle used in the sniper attacks.

The media is stating flatly that the AR-15 is the weapon used in the DC sniper murders. There is no way to honestly make this statement. At best the AR-15 rifle found in the vehicle of the guilty until proven innocent snipers from the state of Washington is an AR-15 which is in the die lot of many, thousands, of AR-15 rifles. Sorry, but to narrow the AR-15 found in their car to THE DC sniper murder weapon is a big flat lie. Also, as I mentioned in another writing, there is a way to make numerous weapons have the same ballistics.

Nearly a month before last month's deadly spree began in the Washington area, a man was shot (LaRuffa) six times at close range as he locked up his restaurant in suburban Clinton, Md. Paul LaRuffa, 55, survived.

Now this makes sense to me. One of the guys assumed guilty in the DC sniper murders, the young one, supposedly and logically shot this guy in a HOLD UP and shot him SIX, as in SIX times, and DIDN'T kill the guy. Hello. Is anyone listening? It is logical to me because an AR-15 is easy to fire numerous shots, especially if the shooter is unfamiliar with the AR-15, nervous, and probably on drugs. So now the New York times types propaganda media wants us to believe this young kid who shoots a guy six times at close range and doesn't even kill him turns into a cold blooded professional trained sniper who kills from long distance using one bullet at night and is so calm and cool he finds the single casing in the dark, instantly, and speeds off to safety undetected. I can believe the evidence against the guys from the state of Washington in their Mongomery robbery/murder and now shooting the guy six times and stealing his laptop, but to jump from robbery/murder to 15 DC sniper murders with ballastics which tell us only that the same caliber gun was used in both the laptop shooting and the DC sniper murders is not a logical, done deal, follow the dots conclusion, in my opinion. Also if LaRuffa, the guy shot six times by an AR-15 at close range, could tell us if the AR-15 had a scope on it when he was assaulted, that would be important.

LaRuffa's (this is the guy shot six times) assailant took his laptop computer. Law enforcement sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that the laptop stolen in the Sept. 5 shooting was the same one found in Muhammad and Mavlo's car.

Knowing what I know about Freeh type of thugs, probably the real DC snipers, setting up patsies, I find this laptop computer deal highly fascinating. It is important for the Freeh types in their framing of the patsies to get a laptop computer into evidence because Freeh types can then put all kinds of incriminating evidence on the computer to nail the NYtts guilty until proven innocent guys from the state of Washington. So we are talking shrewd manipulation. Freeh types had to manipulate a holdup in which a laptop is stolen by their patsies. Now think about it. A seventeen year old kid who does not know how to use an AR-15 fires six times at a guy at close range, and the kid is an illegal alien from some foreign country. This kid and the 41 year old are now going to know how to turn on the laptop computer, keep it charged and working perfectly, without instructions, uneducated, broke, living out of a car, no power supply for the laptop computer, and devise & use a complicated code probably Ames couldn't figure out, and this code leaves a computer trail that guarantees the two assumed guilty of the DC sniper murders until proven innocent from the state of Washington, get the needle. What I am trying to say is I doubt the guilty until proven innocent guys from the state of Washington know how to use the laptop, and unless Freeh's thugs train them while in jail, these guys could not even begin to explain how to use the laptop computer much less use it, living out of a car, no power supply, broke. I have been messing with my regular computer for 3 years and I couldn't begin to use a laptop computer and most people who are not trained in computers would not even mess with a laptop computer, and toss in the pressure the guys were/are under. Guys busy killing people daily. Mr. Freeh this is BS. These guys don't have Master's degrees and have years of spy training. You guys are writing James Bond scripts for guys who have IQs of a tree plus three. At this point in time these 15 DC sniper murders are pointing to another fascist, racist, bash Arabs & illegal aliens, GOV, election season, look for an excuse to fight a war under every stone, Big George's New World Order, make war on America, Freeh thug, New York times types, zioni$t caliber conspiracy.