8-21-07

Rothchilds and Rockefellers Receive, Manipulate Death Threats?

The Rockerfellers and Rothchilds are the biggest owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud.The Federal Reserve Fraud is the US banking system - the scam to beat all scams. John D. Rockefeller and his boss, believe it or not John D. Rockefeller had a boss, his name was Henry Flagler, formed the Federal Reserve Fraud. The Federal Reserve Fraud is a private US corporation that pays no income taxes and loans USA banks money, trillions of dollars of money, at the Federal Funds Rate, which is now at 5.25%, and this Federal Reserve Fraud private company makes all the interest charged banks. Trillions. This Federal Reserve Fraud private corporation pays zero, zip, nada for the trillions it loans. How does the Federal Reserve Fraud get its money it loans banks - it prints it. Talk about a hot air Ponzi scheme. The Federal Reserve Fraud is the world's greatest Ponzi scheme.

One may ask how did foreigners, Rothchilds, Germans, the King of England slim into the USA banking system known as Federal Reserve Fraud? A German named Paul Warburg, zioni$t, Satanic, of course, sold this Federal Reserve Fraud scam to Henry Flagler and John D. Rockefeller, and then had Flagler murdered by pushing him down a flight of stairs at his Whitehall mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, May 20, 1913. The foreign scum, Rothchilds, ect., who have an ownership position the Federal Reserve Fraud got their shares by murdering Henry Flagler and getting the shares Flagler negotiated for himself in Federal Reserve Fraud. So the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud is comprised of two sets of Satanic losers, foreign scum, Rothchilds, Queen of England, ect. and local scum, Rockefellers ect. Al Gore's daughter married one of the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud. Since I was raised rich it would not surprise me if I know personally at least one owner of the Federal Reserve Fraud.

US Congress gave Rockefeller Rothchilds, ect. the US banking system just before Christmas 1913 in exchange for Federal income taxes, February 3, 1913. So the US taxpayer foots the bill for the trillions the US government pays the Rockefellers Rothchilds in interest through the private corporation know as the Federal Reserve Fraud. Why do you think Congress, (most of the members of Congress owe their jobs to the Rockefellers and Rothchilds), always wants higher interest rates and the people borrowing more and more money? The more people borrow, the more the Rockefellers and Rothchilds make in interest off our loans.

What have the Rockefellers and Rothchilds given back to the people in exchange for the trillions they loot from us through Federal Funds interest? World Wars, AIDS, drugs, $3.00 gasoline, corporate monopolies, September 11, the Iraq Iran War, biological diseases, James Steele and John Negroponte, Big and Little George, Harry Reid, the bio energy scam, world food shortage, Darfur, racism, zioni$m, communi$m, Karl Rove, Waco, spying on the people, freedom of speech trashed, the dismantling of God, Pat Tillman shot in the back, the US political system in which many members of the US Congress, US Supreme Court judges, CIA, and other powerful people under their thumb, and every dirty deed imaginable. A walk in Rockefeller Rothchild shoes is a walk through Satan's most coward unimaginable filth.

If the list above of horrible deeds is not enough, logic dictates the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud want to kill millions or possibly billions of people on the planet by spreading biological diseases around the planet, possibly by infecting our brave soldiers and using them as human pandemic incubators. Henry Makow Ph.D., and his web site http://www.savethemales.ca/ has published at least one article by Benjamin Fulford, Secret government promises big changes, http://benjaminfulford.com/secretgoverment.html, which basically states there are powerful people around the planet who have had it with the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud dirty deeds' and other their tough guys are going to start killing off the owners of Federal Reserve Fraud. Actually Mr. Fulford names the bad guys as "The illuminati," and mentions the names Rothchild and Rockefeller, but he does not name the bad guys as the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud. It is my opinion the worst of the worst bad guys are the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud because the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud have stolen the most amount of money and money allows the bad guys to do their dirty deeds.

Mr. Fullford mentions the removal of Karl Rove as proof the owners of Federal Reserve Fraud are taking the threats of other powerful forces to kill them seriously. Who knows? Certainly the planet has a choice, stop the Federal Reserve Fraud or die. If powerful forces on this planet have started killing off the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud this is good news. Killing off some of the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud will not change their plans to overturn the present elected Iraqi government and replace it with a Saddam Hussein Sunni Baathist communi$t police state government, nuke Iran and manipulate a world wide nuclear holocaust, because the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud know they are personally dead if they do not dominate and control every single person on this planet.

Mr. Fulford's claims other powerful forces are killing off the owners of the Federal Reserve Fraud could be propaganda, the work of, instigated by, manipulation by the Federal Reserve Fraud itself. Remember the lame argument for the USA attacking Iraq - Little George wanted to get Saddam Hussein because Saddam Hussein had tried murder his Daddy. The entire Saddam Hussien Bush revenge argument is/was total and complete BS because Big George and Saddam Hussein are on the same side - both are Federal Reserve Fraud lapdogs. Thinking people realize Saddam Hussein is not dead, and the reason Sunni are still killing Shiites and our brave soldiers is because Saddam Hussein and his sons, or at least one son is still alive, are alive and leading Sunni Baathist communi$t$ to make war in the Mid East. Just as the Federal Reserve Fraud manipulated Seung Hui Cho to go nuts at Virginia Tech to manipulate Americans to hate Asians, Mr. Fulford's claims could be another Federal Reserve Fraud manipulation to beat the drums of hatred against Asians.

Why do I know so much about the Rockefellers, Henry Flagler, Mary Lilly Kenan, and Federal Reserve Fraud? Well I read most of "A Study in Power" by Alan Nevins, (the history of Standard Oil financed by JDR) just looked at my personal copies to make sure I spelled Nevins' correctly, 34 years ago or so when the books caught my attention while I was at the University of Houston library studying for an insurance course I was taking then. After I moved to Wilmington in 1984 Mary Lilly stories were told to me by her direct descendents, she had no children, but the people who inherited her money she inherited from Flagler, and descendents of players in her amazing drama. God, in my opinion, places me in the correct life plan to be able to understand the conspiracies of the world, open the correct Seven Seals, and to learn what I need to know, to do what I do today. Still think God does not exist and anything God can do you can do better?

August 20, 2007
Padilla Jury Opens Pandora's Box

by P C R
José Padilla's conviction on terrorism charges on Aug. 16 was a victory, not for justice, but for the U.S. Justice (sic) Department's theory that a U.S. citizen can be convicted, not for committing a terrorist act but for allegedly harboring aspirations to commit such an act. By agreeing with the Justice (sic) Department's theory, the incompetent Padilla jury delivered a deadly blow to the rule of law and opened Pandora's Box.

Anglo-American law is a human achievement 800 years in the making. Over centuries law was transformed from a weapon in the hands of government into a shield of the people from unaccountable power. The Padilla jury's verdict turned law back into a weapon.

The jury, of course, had no idea of what was at stake. It was a patriotic jury that appeared in court with one row of jurors dressed in red, one in white, and one in blue (Peter Whoriskey, Washington Post, Aug. 17, 2007). It was a jury primed to be psychologically and emotionally manipulated by federal prosecutors desperate for a conviction for which there was little, if any, supporting evidence. For the jury, patriotism required that they strike a blow for America against terrorism. No member of this jury was going to return home to accusations of letting off a person who has been portrayed as a terrorist in the U.S. media for five years.

The "evidence" against Padilla consists of three items: (1) seven intercepted telephone conversations, (2) a 10-year-old non-relevant video of Osama bin Laden, and (3) an alleged application to a mujahedeen (not terrorist) training camp with Padilla's fingerprints. We will examine each in turn.

The International Herald Tribune and Associated Press reported in detail on the telephone intercepts (June 19, 2007): "Accused al-Qaeda operative José Padilla was never overheard using purported code words for violent jihad in intercepted telephone conversations and spoke often about his difficulties in learning Arabic while studying in Egypt, the lead FBI case agent testified Tuesday. The questioning of FBI Agent James T. Kavanaugh by Padilla attorney Michael Caruso focused on seven intercepted telephone calls on which Padilla's voice is heard mostly talking about his marriage and his studies but never about Islamic extremism. … Caruso asked Kavanaugh if Padilla ever was heard using what prosecutors say were code words for violent jihad. … 'No, he does not,' Kavanaugh replied. … Caruso asked Kavanaugh if Padilla was ever overheard discussing jihad training. 'No jihad training that I've seen,' Kavanaugh said. … 'He's not referring to anything here but studying Arabic, correct? Study means study, right?' Caruso asked. 'That's what they're talking about,' Kavanaugh testified."

Despite the FBI's testimony that the intercepted telephone messages contained no incriminating evidence, the "patriotic" jury accepted the federal prosecutor's unsupported accusation that there were hidden code words in the message indicating that Padilla was a terrorist. After all, who but a terrorist would want to learn Arabic?

The video of bin Laden had no relevance whatsoever to the charges in the case. The video is 10 years old and makes no reference to any of the defendants. Moreover, none of the defendants were accused of ever being in contact with bin Laden. The only purpose of the video was to arouse in jurors fear, anger, and disturbing memories associated with Sept. 11, 2001. The fact that the judge let prosecutors sway a fearful and vengeful patriotic jury with emotion and passion rather than evidence is obviously grounds for appeal.

Whoriskey reports that in their closing arguments prosecutors mentioned al-Qaeda more than 100 times and urged jurors to think of al-Qaeda and groups alleged to be affiliated with it as an international murder conspiracy. Padilla "trained to kill,' Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Frazier misinformed the jury in his closing statement.

Who Padilla wished to kill was never identified, but according to the prosecutors he had been wanting to kill persons unknown since 1998. Padilla was convicted for harboring alleged intentions, not for committing any acts. Indeed, no harmful acts are charged to Padilla. The incompetent jury fell for the prosecutors' wild tale of a murder conspiracy many years old that had no results.

As Andrew Cohen put it, Padilla and the two co-defendants were convicted on the charge of "terrorist-wannabes" on the basis of "evidence that federal authorities did not believe amounted to a crime when it was gathered back before 2001." Cohen concludes: "it's further proof that if you can convince an American jury that a man in the dock had anything to do with al-Qaeda, you can pretty much bank on a conviction no matter how tenuous the evidence" (WashingtonPost.com, Aug. 16, 2007).

The training camp application form is as suspect as any evidence can be. Moreover, the prosecution had no evidence that Padilla actually attended such a camp. Padilla was held illegally for 3.5 years and tortured. At any time during his illegal detention and torture, Padilla could have been handed a form, thus tainting it with his fingerprints.

Amy Goodman, the forensic psychiatrist Dr. Angela Hegarty, the Christian Science Monitor, and others have described how U.S. interrogators abused Padilla and destroyed his mind. To expect a person as badly tortured and abused as Padilla to retain the wits not to touch a piece of paper handed to him, or forced into his hands, is unreasonable.

When Padilla was arrested five years ago in 2002, the U.S. government charged that he was about to set off a radioactive "dirty bomb" in a U.S. city that would kill tens or even hundreds of thousands of Americans. The story was a total lie, a fabrication designed to keep the fear level high after 9/11 in order to keep support for the Bush regime's wars and domestic police state. None of the charges on which Padilla was illegally held, during those years before the U.S. Supreme Court intervened and ordered the Bush regime to release Padilla or bring him to trial, were part of the charges on which Padilla was tried.

There is little doubt that Padilla's conviction, and probably also the convictions of the two co-defendants, is a terrible injustice. But the damage done goes far beyond the damage to the defendants. What the red, white, and blue Padilla jury has done is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and give us the rule of men.

The U.S. Constitution and Anglo-American legal tradition prevent indictments, much less convictions, based on a prosecutor's theory that a person wanted to commit a crime in the past or might want to in the future. Padilla has harmed no one. There is no evidence that he made an agreement with any party to harm anyone whether for money or ideology or any reason. The FBI testified that the telephone calls were innocuous. The bin Laden video was evidence of nothing pertaining to the defendants. The piece of paper, alleged to be a personnel form recovered from an al-Qaeda camp in Afghanistan, is nothing but a piece of paper and an assertion.

As Lawrence Stratton and I demonstrated in our book, The Tyranny of Good Intentions (2000), the protective features of law had been seriously eroded prior to the Bush regime's assault on civil liberty in the name of "the war on terror." The U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights rest on Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England. Blackstone explained law as the protective principles against tyranny – habeas corpus, due process, attorney-client privilege, no crime without intent, no retroactive law, no self-incrimination.

Jeremy Bentham claimed that these protective principles were outmoded in a democracy in which the people controlled the government and no longer had reasons to fear it. The problem with Blackstone's "Rights of Englishmen," Bentham said, is that these civil liberties needlessly limit the government's power and, thus, its ability to protect citizens from crime. Bentham wanted to preempt criminal acts by arresting those likely to commit crimes in advance, before the budding criminals entered into a life of crime. Bentham, like the Bush regime, the Padilla jury, and the Republican Federalist Society, did not understand that when law becomes a weapon, liberty dies regardless of the form of government. If they do understand, they prefer unaccountable government power to individual liberty.

The incompetent Padilla jury has done Americans and their liberty far more damage than will ever be done by terrorists, other than those in our criminal justice (sic) system who now wield the powers that Bentham wanted to give them.

The Padilla case was the way the Bush Justice (sic) Department implemented its strategy for taking away the legal principles that protect American citizens. Padilla is an American citizen. He was denied habeas corpus and his rights to an attorney and due process. He was tortured in an attempt to coerce him into self-incrimination. In treating Padilla in these ways, the U.S. Department of Justice (sic) violated both the U.S. Constitution and federal law. There is no doubt whatsoever that the Justice (sic) Department committed far more crimes than did Padilla.

By the time the Supreme Court finally intervened, Padilla was universally known as the demonized "dirty bomber," an "enemy combatant" who was arrested before he could set off a radioactive bomb in a U.S. city. The Injustice Department could now simultaneously convict Padilla and enshrine Benthamite law simply by appealing to fear and patriotism. And that is what happened.

Under Benthamite law, the individual has no rights. The new calculus is "the greatest good for the greatest number" as determined by the wielders of power. On the basis of this new law, not written by Congress but invented by the Injustice Department and made precedent by the Padilla jury's verdict, the U.S. can lock up people based on the percentage of crime committed by their race, gender, income class, or ethnic group.

Under Benthamite law, people can be arrested and prosecuted for thought crimes. Under Benthamite law, it is the government that protects the people, not the Constitution and Bill of Rights that protect the individual. Benthamite law makes "advocacy speech," for example, a call for the overthrow of the U.S. government, upheld in the 1969 Supreme Court decision, Brandenburg v. Ohio, a serious federal crime.

The Padilla jury has opened Pandora's Box. Unless the conviction is overturned on appeal, American liberty died in the Padilla jury's verdict.

The easiest least dangerous way to expose the Federal Reserve Fraud is to

donate to Randy Crow for President

Please send comments to randycrow@randycrow.com