5-25-09
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19855
Submitted by vidalizer on Fri, 04/17/2009 - 12:21am.
Barry Jennings | Dylan Avery | Jack Blood | WTC7
Official archive page: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Blood_09.html
Interview MP3: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Jack-Blood-32k-041609.mp3
By Jack Blood
www.wFUradio.com
www.deadlinelive.info
Yesterday, April 15th 2009 I was contacted by “Loose Change” director, and narrator Dylan Avery who said that he had recently begun investigating the death of Barry Jennings, and had found some new information relating to his death.
It seems that there is a very good possibility that Jennings’ death could have been due to foul play. Though the investigations are on going, initial findings are somewhat alarming. The conclusion is still forthcoming, but I was shocked by what I heard.
It seems that Dylan had hired a private investigator to look into Jennings death which remains shrouded in mystery. His motive was simply to bring some closure to the life of Barry Jennings, and in doing so to honor the memory of this brave American. The Investigator ended up referring the case to Law enforcement before refunding his pay, and told Dylan never to contact him again. Very unusual to say the least. Dylan also paid a visit to the Jennings home. He found it vacant and for sale.
Personally, something is really beginning to stink here. Why would a highly paid PI refuse to continue his investigation? Why did he refer the matter to police? He is not talking. What is he afraid of. Was he warned to cease and desist? If so by whom?
http://edwardrynearson.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/new-information-on-the-death-of-911-eyewitness-barry-jennings/
http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/cheney-lies-in-defense-of-torture/
The lie Cheney told about A.Q. Khan
by Larisa Alexandrovna
Somewhere among the strategically placed references to September 11, 2001 and his unapologetic defense of torture, Dick Cheney managed to lie about a series of topics and events that are well documented. It is, after all, the electronic age and facts are not difficult to come by.
One must consider too what motivated the networks to carry a speech by a former Vice President in defense of torture. The ethics vacuum is mind-boggling.
We have come to a point where a former Vice President told the world that America tortures – but calls it something else - and the networks cover this as though it were a random stump speech, not the actual embarrassment and horror that it is. The facts too are missing, although only a few news outlets seem interested in the truth.
No One Could Have Imagined
Cheney says that the attacks of September 11, 2001 “caused everyone to take a serious second look at threats that had been gathering for a while and enemies whose plans were getting bolder and more sophisticated.”
On the contrary, the plans were not new and bold and were well documented by the Central Intelligence Agency. In fact, a month prior to the attacks, President Bush and Dick Cheney both received a briefing on the matter. The August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the US,” is fairly clear. The PDB mentions the following:
A clandestine source said in 1998 that a Bin Laden cell in New York was recruiting Muslim-American youth for attacks.
We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a [deleted text] service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Shaykh" 'Umar' Abd aI-Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.
Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.
The FBI is conducting approximately
70 investigations throughout the U.S. that it considers Bin Laden-related. CIA
and the FBI are investigating a call to our embassy in the UAE in May saying
that a group or Bin Laden supporters was in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives.
What did Bush do after receiving this briefing? He promptly went on vacation.
It is unclear what Cheney did, but whatever it was, it had nothing to do with
national security. In addition, torture was unneeded in obtaining this information.
What was needed, however, was a White House interested in protecting our nation.
It is therefore remarkable that Cheney continues to use 9/11 as a reason for
his abuses of power, rather than be shamed by his indifference and negligence.
A.Q. Khan Network
Here is what he says about A.Q. Khan, the "father" of Pakistani nuclear weapons and a Middle East black market that sprang up around him:
This was the world in which al-Qaida was seeking nuclear technology and A.Q. Khan was selling nuclear technology on the black market. We had the anthrax attack from an unknown source. We had the training camps in Afghanistan and dictators like Saddam Hussein with known ties to Mideast terrorists.
--snip--
We did all of these things and, with
bipartisan support, put all of these policies in place. It has resulted in serious
blows against enemy operations: the takedown of the A.Q. Khan network and the
dismantling of Libya's nuclear program.
Now let's look at the actual facts of this.
In 2007, BBC’s Newsnight and the Guardian reported the following:
The Bush administration thwarted investigations of Dr. A.Q. Khan, known as the "father" of Pakistan's atomic bomb. This week, Khan confessed to selling atomic secrets to Libya, North Korea, and Iran.
The Bush Administration has expressed
shock at disclosures that Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror, has been
running a nuclear secrets bazaar. In fact, according to the British news teams'
sources within US intelligence agencies, shortly after President Bush's inauguration,
his National Security Agency (NSA) effectively stymied the probe of Khan Research
Laboratories, the Pakistani agency in charge of the bomb project. CIA and other
agents told BBC they could not investigate the spread of 'Islamic Bombs' through
Pakistan because funding appeared to originate in Saudi Arabia.
Moreover, in 2003 it was Cheney and his team, including his former Chief of
Staff I. Scooter Libby, who outed a covert operation tracking some - at least
minimally - of the A.Q. Khan network. I broke this story in 2005 and here is
what I reported then:
According to current and former intelligence officials, Plame Wilson, who worked on the clandestine side of the CIA in the Directorate of Operations as a non-official cover (NOC) officer, was part of an operation tracking distribution and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction technology to and from Iran.
--snip--
While many have speculated that Plame was involved in monitoring the nuclear
proliferation black market, specifically the proliferation activities of Pakistan's
nuclear "father," A.Q. Khan, intelligence sources say that her team
provided only minimal support in that area, focusing almost entirely on Iran.
Although I was told a good deal more than this, including her then-most recent
work on Iraq, I was restricted by my sources to reporting ONLY about Iran and
ONLY touching on Pakistan. The nature of the "minimal support" remains
highly classified. I was also restricted from using certain words and still
have not been released from that restriction.
The reason for why my sources insisted on these conditions was that although they had felt strongly that what Cheney had done was indeed treason, they also felt strongly that too much information would expose the operation further and cause additional damages to agency methods and sources.
What we do know is that a group of clandestine officers provided at least "minimal support" in monitoring the A.Q. Khan network. What we also know is that this operation was compromised because Dick Cheney's office had to silence a good, honest, few Americans from speaking out about the lies that led us into Iraq.
Yet Cheney claims success in taking down A.Q. Khan's network.
Yes, it boggles the mind. These are but two examples in a speech littered with such claims despite well documented facts. Imagine, too, the networks covered this for the world to see. What did they cover? The world saw a former Vice President giving a speech in defense of torture and lying about even the most basic, known facts of what the Bush administration has done. If he could so brazenly lie about topics such as these, what else is he lying about? What must the world think of us for giving this man a podium on national television? Worse still, there are many defending him, regardless of the truth and regardless of the illegality of torture.
Tags: A.Q. Khan, AEI Speech, August 6 PDB, Dick Cheney, Larisa Alexandrovna, Media Ethics, Propaganda, torture, Valerie Plame Wilson
http://www.atlargely.com/
May 23, 2009
The Department of Pre-Crime is now open....
Are you dark skinned and/or a Muslim? Well, welcome. The Department of Pre-Crime
would like to incite you to violence, create a plot for you to vent that violence,
and supply you with weapons to carry the plot out. Our recruiting officers will
be at your nearest Mosque.
Investigative reporter Robert Dreyfuss has an excellent article up at Alternet about how the New York "terrorist" stopped or rather, set-up:
"So a creepy thug buttonholes people at a mosque, foaming at the mouth about violence and jihad? This is law enforcement? Just imagine if someone did this at a local church, or some synagogue. And the imam says the people "believed he was a government agent."
Preying on these losers, none of whom were apparently actual Muslims, the "confidential informant" orchestrated the acquisition of a disabled Stinger missile to shoot down military planes and cooked up a wild scheme about attacking a Jewish center in the Bronx."
Read the whole thing.
Links broken; Why?
August 4, 2008 Permalink
Jean C. Duley... tell us again...
Submitted by Robert Arend
by Larisa Alexandrovna: Okay, well the more research I do into the now infamous
Ms. Jean C. Duley - the 'therapist' who filed a restraining order against the
alleged anthrax attacks suspect Bruce E. Ivins - the more her story sounds like
a whole load of crap.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16942
Okay, well the more research I do into the now infamous Ms. Jean C. Duley - the "therapist" who filed a restraining order against the alleged anthrax attacks suspect Bruce E. Ivins - the more her story sounds like a whole load of crap.
Let's rehash Ms. Duley's role in the whole saga.
According to The Smoking Gun, documents they obtained and posted show that Ms. Duley filed a restraining order request against Bruce Ivins on July 24th. In that complaint, she wrote the following (the errors are hers):
client has a history dating to his graduate days of homicidal threats, actions, plans, threats & actions toward theripist. Dr. David Irwin his psychiatrist called him homicidal, sociopathic with clear intentions will testify with other details FBI involved, currently under investigation & will be charged with 5 capital murders. I have been subpoena to testify before a federal grand jury August 1, 2008 in Washington, D.C.
It is hard to know where to begin with this piece of work, but let us start with the obvious:
Continued: http://www.atlargely.com/2008/08/jean-c-duley-te.html