2-22-08

The Illinois senator's Wisconsin victory left him with 1,303 delegates in The Associated Press' count, compared with 1,233 for Clinton.

Big media fails to tell the reader Hillary picked up, won fair and square, but uncounted as of now, 182 delegates in Florida and Michigan to Obama's 67, and she has in fact 1415 delegates to Obama's 1370. Ms. Clinton is leading, not losing to Obama, by 45 delegates. The Associated Press writes Obama easily extends his lead, without mentioning the fact with the Florida and Michigan delegates in the count, Obama is losing, not winning.

Why is big media painting Obama as an unstoppable freight train and a sure winner of the Democratic nomination for president when in fact if one counts the delegates correctly and the way courts will count delegates, Obama is losing? The Federal Reserve Fraud owns big media and the Federal Reserve Fraud knows if big media paints Obama as the winner their articles will act as a self fulfilling prophesy and sway Texas and Ohio 370 convention delegates to Obama.

Don't expect USAToday and the New York Times to print their usual Hispanic and Black racist pictures and articles filled with ethnic slurs between now and March 4th.The Federal Reserve Fraud is betting that by ordering big media to cut out the usual racism for a week they can sway Hispanics' to vote Obama. Big media is effective with their means but time will tell if they can erase years of pitting Hispanics and Blacks against each other in a week of non racial slurs. Of course the instant Obama gets the Democratic nod for president it will back to racism as usual.

USAToday ran an article "McCain: There was no improper conduct, " an article which suggests McCain had an improper relationship with a Jewish lobbyist. Why is big media pointing the finger at McCain, when we know McCain is the Federal Reserve Fraud's choice for president. A McCain attack is meaningless since he has the Republican nomination, it calms the Clinton Obama rhetoric, and it masks for the instant McCain as the Federal Reserve Fraud's candidate. It also may be a way of building McCain's Jewish support.

Clinton 1233 Florida 105 Michigan 77 Total 1415

Obama 1303 Florida 67 Michigan 0 Total 1370

Clinton is leading Obama by 45 delegates

In the overall race for the nomination, Obama leads with 1,303 delegates, including separately chosen party and elected officials known as super delegates. Clinton had 1,233.

"He said,"" She said," concerning Florida and Michigan

Media is taking the Obama side on the Florida and Michigan delegate debate and media states the delegates should not count because the candidates agreed not to campaign in Florida. Media fails to point out the reason Democratic candidates did not campaign in Florida - they were ordered not to do so by the DNC under threat of losing political standing as a Democrat if they did so. Democrat Mike Gravel did campaign in Florida and in fact was kicked out of the New Hampshire debates and shunned as a Democratic political candidate. Because the DNC did wrong to nullify Florida and Michigan delegates it does not follow that the candidates did anything wrong for not campaigning in Florida and Michigan. Actually Howard Dean nullifying Florida and Michigan's delegates strikes me as a conspiracy to throw the election to the Republicans by making Obama the Democratic candidate for president. My guess is the DNC conspiracy goes like this: Political experts figured the only way to throw the decision to Obama was to nullify Florida and Michigan's delegates and then pressure the Super Delegates to vote for Obama. This country did not even have political parties when the US Constitution was written and political parties are usurping political power from the voter and the power of the states to choose its candidates. 2008 political primaries have shown me one most important fact. A hand full of people are running this country against US Constitution intent and the will of the people. The Federal Reserve Fraud owns Yalies Little George, Howard Dean, the DNC, John Kerry and the GOP and they are working together to make the United States a one party communi$t country by throwing the election to Obama so media can play the race card against Obama in the General to keep the presidency in Republican hands.

Mr Ickes also argued the results of delegates from Michigan and Florida should count even though the candidates agreed not to campaign in those states.

The national Democratic Party stripped the two states of delegates after they flouted party rules and moved up the date of their primaries.

Obama argues: Senator Obama's campaign promptly shot back, accusing Senator Clinton of planning to undermine the popular will of Democratic voters.

"The Clinton campaign should focus on winning pledged delegates as a result of elections, not these say or do anything to win tactics that could undermine Democrats' ability to win the general election," said Obama campaign manager David Plouffe in an email.

Since when did Florida and Michigan not have elections, even if Howard Dean waved his magic wand and nullified Florida and Michigan's primary elections. Obama is talking out of both sides of his mouth when he says the popular votes of Florida and Michigan should count but not award the Florida and Michigan delegates. Counting delegates according to the way states voted and requesting the will of the people in Florida and Michigan be respected is hardly doing anything except what is right, even if Obama's sense of justice does not include seating Florida and Michigan delegates fairly chosen by their respective states. Howard Dean and the DNC throwing the presidency to the Republicans negates the will of the voter and is not the American way.

Obama advocated treason - Invasion of Pakistan without US Congress authorization.

The CIA engaged in treason recently when it invaded Pakistan to hit a so called al-Queda operative. There is so much "he said" "she said" concerning this operation one could write volumes on the subject and not get any closer to the truth. However the bottom line comes across as Barack Obama gave the CIA permission to invade Pakistan - violations of International Law and treason according to the US Constitution.

Just some of the unbelievable implications in this subject are these.The al Queda is financed by Federal Reserve Fraud. The Federal Reserve Fraud owns and tells War Criminal Little George what to do as well as Howard Dean, the DNC, the GOP, many members of the US Congress and big media. Big media is supporting Obama because their owners the Federal Reserve Fraud tells them to, most likely to play the race card during the General to throw the presidency to the Republicans.

bin Laden has been dead since 2001.

Some articles state the al Queda operative mentioned in Pakistn was killed and other articles state his death was not confirmed.

Incredibly the CIA and the USA military is looking for an excuse to invade Pakistan and has justified its Pakistan presence from Pakistan invited us to invade it to this equally incredibly lame excuse, Barak Obama suggested we invade Pakistan in August 2007.

Anyway one cuts it, 2008 has got to be one of to the most important years in the history of the Universe. The last seven years have been the most corrupt un American years in my lifetime. 2008 is shaping up a damned the torpedoes, full steam ahead year. In my opinion big media has played the race card continually during my lifetime. Therefore I see Barack Obama as an invention of those who use racism for their agenda and the intent is to use Barack Obama to destabilize the United States.

CIA Operation Similar To Tactic Obama Advocated, Bush Criticized
February 19, 2008 04:07 PM

On the front page of Tuesday's Washington Post was an article detailing how in late January U.S. forces, acting with autonomy inside Pakistan, were able to target and kill Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior al-Qaeda commander.

The strike, which came without the Pakistani government's knowledge and helped eliminate an individual who had long eluded the spy-agency's capture, was an obvious boon in the War on Terror. But the political implications of the operation were just as fascinating.

In August, Sen. Barack Obama had made the argument that, as president, he would target Al Qaeda officials in Pakistan even without the country's acquiescence -- the type of attack that, six months later, proved to be successful.

At the time, Obama was roundly criticized for his remarks, both by his Democratic competitors for the White House and by the Bush administration.

"We think that our approach to Pakistan is not only one that respects the sovereignty of Pakistan, but also is designed so that we are working in cooperation," said then-Press Secretary Tony Snow.

And just one week ago, President Bush himself lambasted Obama's approach to foreign affairs.

"I certainly don't know what he believes in," Bush said on February 10, about Obama. "The only foreign policy thing I remember he said was he's going to attack Pakistan and embrace Ahmadinejad."

To be sure, not everything is known about the extent and execution of the CIA's operation. But, on the surface, it carries similarities to Obama's stated approach towards Pakistan's terrorism problem, the same approach Bush trivialized.

Here is Obama's August 2 statement at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars:

"I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges... But let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. ... If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf will not act, we will."
And here are some excerpts from Tuesday's Washington Post article.
In the predawn hours of Jan. 29, a CIA Predator aircraft flew in a slow arc above the Pakistani town of Mir Ali. The drone's operator, relying on information secretly passed to the CIA by local informants, clicked a computer mouse and sent the first of two Hellfire missiles hurtling toward a cluster of mud-brick buildings a few miles from the town center.

The missiles killed Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior al-Qaeda commander and a man who had repeatedly eluded the CIA's dragnet. It was the first successful strike against al-Qaeda's core leadership in two years, and it involved, U.S. officials say, an unusual degree of autonomy by the CIA inside Pakistan.

It is an approach that some U.S. officials say could be used more frequently this year, particularly if a power vacuum results from yesterday's election and associated political tumult. The administration also feels an increased sense of urgency about undermining al-Qaeda before President Bush leaves office, making it less hesitant, said one official familiar with the incident.
Having requested the Pakistani government's official permission for such strikes on previous occasions, only to be put off or turned down, this time the U.S. spy agency did not seek approval. The government of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf was notified only as the operation was underway, according to the officials, who insisted on anonymity because of diplomatic sensitivities.

The least dangerous least expensive way to stop the Federal Reserve Fraud and the bad guys is contribute to Randy Crow - Democrat for President.