Americans speak, even if the Times won't print it

Some 120 super rich Americans, including Warren Buffett, George Soros and the father of Bill Gates," says the IHT news article, "are urging Congress NOT to repeal taxes on estates and gifts." THIS SHOULD BE HUGE NEWS. Not one word of this in the US media.

The father of Bill Gates was so agitated by the prospect of letting the na$i gov. behind the gov. decide for themselves who gets their money that he organized a petition effort against it. Signers include Soros, a few Rockefellers, and Ben Cohen, founder of Ben and Jerry's ice cream company.

Mr. Buffett said he did not actually sign the petition because he thought it did not go far enough. He said he believes it would be a "terrible mistake" to stop taking
away accumulated savings after death. It would be, he said, like "choosing the 2020 Olympic team by picking the eldest sons of the gold medal winners in the 2000 Olympics."

"Class warfare? You bet your boots it is" Star News, by Molly Ivens

states, "This (Bush's tax plan) tax cut is beautifully designed and carefully crafted to redistribute wealth from the poor to the rich." There are other writers telling people Bush's tax plan is for the wealthy but none are discussing in plain English the Bush tax plan guarantees economic monopolies, which, in my opinion, is why Bush wants the total and complete elimination of inheritance taxes for Ted Turner/Bill Gates types billionaires. The Democratic Party has even come up with a scaled down tax plan but not one word in the Democratic tax plan indicates the Democratic plan supports anything LESS THAN total and complete elimination of inheritance taxes for billionaires.

If Congress wants to reduce marginal tax rates fairly fine. Although I feel if you make less than $25,000 per year you should not pay any federal or state income taxes. Remember if you make $25,000.00 per year someone is paying social security 15%, $3750.00 per year, and that is No nothing. If Congress wants to increase the exemption on individual inheritance taxes to say $25,000,000.00 or so fine. Most people can't even fathom $25,000,000.00 and secretly get angry thinking about someone with $25,000,000.00 not having to pay one penny in inheritance taxes, as I suggest. Yet these same people who would get angry at a guy or gal with an estate of $25 million not having to pay one dime in inheritance taxes will shrug and say "cool" let's give Bill Gates a total and complete inheritance tax free ride on $70,000,000,000.00. That's $70 billion. Like there is no difference between 6 and 10 zeros. Well, my friend their is a big difference between $25 million and $70 billion. Like a $69,975,000,000.00 million dollar difference.

Does giving Bill Gates a $70,000,000,000.00 free ride on inheritance taxes stimulate the economy? Not one little bit. Actually inheritance taxes may stimulate the economy for it allows others in the economic game once held exclusively by the deceased. What a free ride on billionaire inheritance taxes does do is guarantee the United States will stay a monopolistic, elitists, country forever. This is the heart of the Bush tax scam. Preserving monopolies. And what are monopolies? The heart of a communistic/na$i society. But what I am writing is NOT written in the media. It should be and is proof this world is in bad shape. Uninformed people are slaves.

If the media will not explain and tell the people the truth, i.e. billionaires will not pay one penny in inheritance taxes in the Bush or Democratic Party tax plan, and keeping monopolies in tact is the heart of a communist/na$i society, which, by the way, communism/na$i economic monopolies is treason under the US Constitution, in case Little George has never read the US Constitution, what makes you think the US na$i gov. behind the gov. or their New York times types propaganda department are telling, or will ever tell the American people the truth, both sides of the issue, about anything important going on in the world?

Like what is really up with the US Star Wars missile attack system, Palestine, Yugoslavia, Flight 103, bin Laden, drugs, Falun(Swastika) Gong, Africa, Iraq, Russian sub Kursk, or USS Greeneville.

Isn't it truly amazing "the people" can't even read in the media some billionaires DON'T want their inheritances EXEMPT from federal estate taxes. So what in the heck is going on? Well, there is a bunch out there na$i Zionist types that don't even consider Bill Gates money as belonging to Bill Gates. In the na$i gov. behind the gov. eyes Bill Gates is merely a front for their na$i elitist money. The na$is want monopolies because monopolies prevent individuals from ever accumulating wealth. If no one except the monopolies have money then no one can challenge monopolies. The cowards of cowards rule. So then the na$i gov. behind the gov. controls all the money and everyone else in the world are destitute slaves.

And when all the present day na$i Zionist communists are dead and gone who gets the monopolies, ie. all the world's money? Whoever is the most evil, most common, the filthiest of the filth. The William Safire, Louie Freeh, Alan Greenspan, Clinton/Bush types, New York times types of the world. Those God wakes up in the morning vomiting over.
Connect the dots. A totally monopolistic, na$i, evil world will self destruct.

A survey stated the top 20% of American people economically thought they were in the top 1% of the American people economically. So obviously most wealthy people have no earthly idea how rich Ted Turner/Bill Gates are. These so called richest and most savvy Americans, those in the top 20% of our population economically, have NO correct conception of how much $70,000,000,000.00 really is. The US budget department states that during the first decade of this millennium the US long term debt will INCREASE. And Bush cries Democrats use fuzzy math. A so called possible US 5 trillion dollar surplus over the next ten years is touted in the media, and US long term debt INCREASES at the same time. And this surplus projection is due to occur with an economy which is slowing. Go fish. I don't believe a word of this surplus mess. How stupid do the Zionist/na$i think the American people are? Obviously, the na$i's consider "the cattle" very stupid.

Afghanistan Opium Said Wiped Out

JALALABAD, Afghanistan - U.N. drug control officers said the Taliban has virtually wiped out opium production in Afghanistan - once the world's largest producer - since banning poppy cultivation in July.

A 12-member team from the U.N. Drug Control Program spent two weeks searching most of the nation's largest opium-producing areas and found so few poppies that they do not expect any opium to come out of Afghanistan this year.

My sources tell me the price of a bag of heroine was down here recently to $25 from $40. In DC the same bag of heroine was selling for $10 down from $20, and heroine in New Jersey and New York City was selling for $5 per bag in some cases. Street prices for heroine seems to be falling when according to this article 75% of the source of heroine was being destroyed Needless to say, something isn't correct.

There may be more to this poppy story than one may realize. Why has the poppy been removed as a product Afghanistan farmers grow? Don't get me wrong I truly hate drugs. One my greatest outrages, even as great as my outrage Big George Bush may have been in charge of the John Kennedy killing, is my outrage against drugs. Drugs also, as we should never forget, are supposed to be under US clandestine force ownership thanks to Big George. But anyway.

These are the words from an Afghanistan farmer who has stopped growing poppy.``Life is very bad for me this year,'' he said. ``Last year I was able to buy meat and wheat and now this year there is nothing.''
Does the US want Afghanistan farmers starving and forced to fight wars of na$i design instead of growing poppy and having enough to eat? Does the Afghanistan opium market effect countries financially the US wants to join NATO like Romania, Bulgaria, Ukraine? Like if these countries loose their opium money they will be forced to fight wars and dance the US led NATO na$i kill every Christian that moves jig or starve.

If Afghanistan has stopped supplying the world with heroine what country or countries are supplying the US heroine market? Mexico? Is this why Little George went to Mexico? To make sure Mexico floods the US with heroine, or else. By the way, I truly love Mexico. The Mexico I know and love would not be in the drug business unless the US clandestine forces were basically forcing the US heroine and crack business on Mexico.

The Tex-Mex border is a police state border. There is no way drugs from Mexico can enter the US across the Tex-Mex border unless US clandestine forces are operating in conjunction with US border guards to guarantee a safe US entrance of drugs from Mexico. My sources say drugs enter the US on ships just as any products from foreign countries are shipped to the US on ships. There is no difference in shipping heroine to the US than shipping coffee or bananas to the US. Our clandestine forces guarantee drugs enter the US safely. The FBI wiped out Gotti and the Mafia so US clandestine forces could own lock, stock, and barrel the US drug trade. The police state, East-West Berlin type, Tex-Mex border establishes Mexico as an occupied, US police state country and guarantees Louie Freeh has no heroine, crack competition. You know the US has a standing army of 10,000 US soldiers on the Tex-Mex border.

One thing is for sure. If in fact Afghanistan has destroyed the heroine trade in their country certainly Afghanistan needs to be lauded as a truly great country and the world should give them all the financial aid they need to establish a non heroine economy. If the US continues to bad mouth Afghanistan, which the media is doing when it says Afghanistan farmers are selling their daughters to keep from starving, in light of Afghanistan destroying its heroine business, then the US is under evil direction, couldn't care less if our kids are on heroine or not, and the US na$i gov. behind the gov. has sick motives behind Afghanistan destroying its poppy crops.

We can take the following to the bank. A starving Afghanistan is a very dangerous Afghanistan.

Israel uses 'Poison Gas' on Palestinians?

PALESTINE Jerusalem-The Palestinian Authority has asked foreign medical labs to investigate its claims - renewed Thursday by Yasser Arafat - that Israeli troops are using ``poison gas'' on Palestinian civilians.

The Israeli army denied the charges, saying that its soldiers use ``standard tear gas'' and smoke bombs against Palestinian civilians.

However, about 60 Palestinian civilians treated at Nasser Hospital for gas inhalation showed symptoms of poison gas poison, said Dr. Yasser Sheikh Ali.

Their blood samples, chest and stomach X-rays, as well as remnants of gas canisters, were sent to foreign medical labs, Palestinian medical officers said.

In November 1999, Soha Arafat, the Palestinian leader's wife, said in the presence of then-first lady Hillary Clinton that ``intensive, daily use of poison gas by Israeli forces'' had caused an increase in cancer rates among Palestinians.

On Thursday, Arafat repeated the claim that Israel was using ``poisonous gas'' against Palestinian civilians.

He also reiterated a charge he made last month that Israel uses ammunition tipped with depleted uranium.

Russia Criticizes Iraq No-Fly Zones

UNITED NATIONS-The U.S. and British enforcement of no-fly zones in Iraq has been increasingly criticized by key Security Council members who say the patrols have no U.N. legal backing and violate Iraq's right to control its airspace.

Russia has led the charge, saying Iraq cannot be expected to let U.N. weapons inspectors back into the country as long as U.S. and British aircraft continue to strike Iraqi targets, as they did Friday in the FIRST military operation authorized by President Bush.

WRONG

Baghdad says U.S., British jets bomb southern Iraq

BAGHDAD, Feb 14 - Iraq said U.S. and British planes struck targets in the south of the country on Tuesday night but no casualties were reported.

The president said the Feb 16 US bombing raid of Iraq was the first he authorized. Well, the US attacked Iraq Feb 14. as the above article proves. By the way, according to the US Constitution it is treason for the President to direct military action against any country unless the President is directed by Congress to direct our military.

In light of Presidents' Clinton and Bush ordering the US military to bomb this, strike that wily, nilly, we are supposed to believe US Defense Secretary D. H. Rumsfeld when he says, the proposed US Star Wars missiles of mass destruction is only a threat to aggressors. WHO decides who are the aggressors the US uses the proposed Star Wars weapons of mass destruction? Rumsfeld? The US na$i gov. behind the gov.? The President? The US Constitution says Congress directs the President when to use military force. But Feb 16 the President used military force on Iraq unconstitutionally and in violation of the UN resolution pertaining to Iraq.

We are not attacking Iraq now because Iraq is a military threat to the United States. The US bombing Iraq now is designed to keep oil prices up and help the stock market. Face it. The US missile mass destruction system will be used to steal money. As Jesus said, MONEY is the root of all evil and MONEY is the name of the na$i US gov. behind the gov.'s mindless hustle.

``What the American militarists are doing at the start of the new administration's activity is a challenge to international security and the entire world community,'' said Col. Gen. Leonid Ivashov, chief of the Russian Defense Ministry's international cooperation department.

``It is not the first time that when the issue of the Iraqi dossiers was about to be closed, the U.S. unleashes military actions and in fact ruins this process,'' the Interfax news agency quoted him as saying.

He appeared to be referring to upcoming talks between the United Nations and Iraq on Feb. 26-27 to try to end the stalemate over weapons inspections and 10-year-old sanctions. Iraq asked for the ``dialogue'' with Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

In 1998, U.N. weapons inspections ground to a halt, (because the US had infiltrated the UN inspection team with US clandestine forces and actually used the spy information we gained as so called UN inspectors in the four-day airstrike) and the United States and Britain launched a four-day airstrike campaign (because the US was angry the world found out the US had sent spies to Iraq under the cover of UN weapon inspectors and NOT) because Baghdad failed to cooperate with U.N. arms experts.

France stopped actively patrolling the no-fly zones that year and has since increased its criticism of the air raids, calling them ``pointless and deadly.''

On Friday, the French Foreign Ministry said the air strikes ``gave rise to questions'' and added, ``We are waiting for explanations from the American administration.''

China quickly condemned the strikes. China and other critics have said "NO" U.N. resolution explicitly authorizes US military to bomb Iraq.
( A US Star Wars missile attack system? The world would be safer to issue all the worlds' 2 year olds AR-15s)

``We are opposed to any use of arms without authority of the Security Council at any circumstances,'' the spokeswoman at China's U.N. mission said.

France, China and others have spoken out about Iraqi civilian casualties. Iraq says some 300 people have been killed and more than 800 injured since the US began illegal & unconstitutional weekly bombing runs over Iraq in December 1998.

The United States, Britain, France, China and Russia are the five permanent Security Council members. (Well, that's 3 against 2 for a world at war.)

Iraq regularly protests what it calls illegal overflights, and has demanded COMPENSATION for damage. (The US will give a US spi $300 million held in Iran for 6 1/2 years but not pay Iraq one penny in damages for 3 years of bombing runs in which 300 Iraqi citizens, not spies, are killed and 800 Iraqi are injured. And the US needs a missile attack system?)

In a letter released this week, Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz urged Annan to intervene to stop the airstrikes, which he called ``unwarranted aggression against an independent, sovereign state.''
(Text book Presidential treason.)

He said Baghdad rejected the ``flimsy excuses and pretexts used by the United States in an attempt to justify their military aggression (to get the price of oil up and prop up the US stock market) against Iraq.''

Iraq Resistance Leaders Talk to US

WASHINGTON - A delegation from Iraqi KLA type terrorists met for more than an hour with Assistant Secretary of State Ned Walker and other officials seeking the $29 million appropriated by Congress for the destabilization of Iraq.

Congress also has appropriated $97 million for military weapons to overthrow the Iraqi government.

This is how the US overthrew the Yugoslavia government. We sent weapons, guns and mortars to the KLA which just so happen to be atheist communist ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, Yugoslavia. US supplying weapons to terrorists in a country to overthrow a sovereign nation is illegal under international law. The US is acting like a rogue nation, terrorist country when we finance terrorists groups to undermine a legitimate government of a country whose oil we covet. The US is also financing bin Laden in bin Laden's efforts to overthrow the established government in Chechnya. Get this headline. "US blamed in murder of Congo's president". Or "US troops supporting offensive in Columbia."

The US is operating as a clandestine terrorist force destabilizing countries all over the world. And yet the US propaganda department calls us a Democracy. Our president is anointed, not elected fairly, democratically. A Democracy does not use a Star Wars missile attack system and finance terrorists to get what they want. na$i's do. Connect the dots.

"Countdown has begun for McVeigh's execution" Star News
Don't you know Louie Freeh and those who manipulated and are in on the Oklahoma City bombing conspiracy are and will be happy campers when McVeigh gets the needle May 16. The Force will get this expert and that expert to say "McVeigh is trying to be a martyr." But we know US clandestine forces are behind the Oklahoma City bombing just as they are behind McVeigh getting the needle, now. How many prisoners in federal prison are in solitary confinement, as is McVeigh? McVeigh is the fist federal offender killed in 37 years. What's different about McVeigh's reasons for dying in federal prison and all the other federal prisoners reasons for living, over the last 37 years? McVeigh could not tell you how he built a fertilizer bomb if he were given freedom in exchange. The Force cowardly manipulated McVeigh to bomb Oklahoma City and the Force is cowardly manipulating McVeigh to get the needle now because Louie Freeh wants a source of embarrassment and hassle for the Federal Force, McVeigh, gone. Waco without the heat. Personally I wish McVeigh would stick it out five years more. Something might break in the next five years to nail Louie. You know Louie is making every day of McVeigh's life hell on earth to get McVeigh to agree to the needle. When the guns are gone you will not to be able to count the number of people Freeh has killed. Stalin's 20 million would not even be a down payment on those of us Louie zaps.

I have been faithfully against Little George as President from before he used the court system unAmericanly to stop counting the votes fairly and got the Supreme na$i$ to anoint him President. So one might expect me not to think Little George's trip to Mexico that great. But the following are international headlines and they definitely do not flatter Little George. Not exactly a good way for Little George to end week four. (1)Bush's Mexico Trip Produces Little, (2)Bush Retreats Back To Texas Ranch, (3)Mexico's Fox hails Bush visit, press skeptical

MEXICO CITY, Feb 17-But local newspapers were less impressed, saying the visit on Friday was upstaged by joint U.S.-British air attacks launched on targets near Baghdad while Fox hosted Bush at his central Mexico ranch.

Mexicans view the so-called certification process, which includes the potential for sanctions, as demeaning and a breach of its sovereignty.

Mexico is a producer of opium poppies, the raw material for heroin. ( Freeh is replacing Afghanistan poppy with Mexican poppy?)

Mexico wants the United States to allow into the country Mexican "guest workers," legalizing their work north of the border. (This is a good idea and one I tout also.)

But the Mexican press were disappointed the visit, which had been anticipated with great fanfare, was ultimately overshadowed by the first major military action of the Bush administration that grabbed headlines worldwide.

"Iraq spoils Fox's fiesta," read the banner headline in the Reforma daily.

The left-leaning La Jornada went as far as to say THE BOMBING WAS A NOT SO SUBTLE MESSAGE FROM WASHINGTON THAT MEXICO SHOULD COOPERATE WITH ITS NORTHERN NEIGHBOR, especially in selling Mexican oil industry to Wall Street na$i monopolists.)

"Over the meeting, described as working and informal, FLOATED A DARK AND FORMAL THREAT OF MILITARY POWER READY TO BE USED AGAINST THE MOST FAITHFUL ALLIES AND SERVANTS," the Mexico City daily said.