2-10-06

Bad Guys Drown 900 Egyptians Aboard the Al Salam 98 Over Mid East nuclear-weapons-free zone

When the Titanic sunk around 1523 people perished and though the Titanic sunk nearly 100 years ago, in 1912, the media still writes about it. Last week the ferry Al Salam 98 sunk in which approximately 900 Egyptians died and the media has basically ignored a horrible catastrophe, probably because the people who died were just Arabs. Sub humans is the eyes of hate filled racists $ulzberger zioni$t$. Why? zioni$t$ and Big George's New World Order bad guys control the media and they do not want the people of the world to ask questions.

Why do we know the sinking of the Al Salam 98 was deliberate and sabotage and the zioni$t are responsible?

• The ferry Al Salam 98 listed for two hours before sinking and there were below deck fires. It is easy to make a ship list. Load the ship improperly. Either fill or drain water from its water tanks. Fires are easy to start. The saboteurs made the ship list and started fires to try and make the sinking of the Al Salam 98 appear as if it was not sunk by saboteurs. Since the Al Salam 98 did not turn around and head back to Duba when it had a serious safety situation we know its sinking was the work of zioni$t saboteurs.
• Almost no media coverage in the United States regarding the sinking of the Al Salam 98 in which 900 Egyptians drown. A deliberate sinking by Israel of a ferry carrying Egyptians is the type of news the USA would not give the American people to keep Americans uninformed of the real reasons and those responsible for starting the imminent war between Israel and/or the USA against Iran.
• Egypt insisted a clause criticizing Israel's nuclear weapons status be included in the International Atomic Energy Agency landmark resolution on Iran's nuclear program and logic dictates Israel would sabotage the Al Salam 98 in retaliation.
• Survivors not rescued for twenty hours - Only a well planned deliberate sinking of the ship would result in a rescue delay of 20 hours.
• No distress signal given - Sign of sabotage.
• No details are being released on the sinking of the Al Salam 98. Where are the corpses? Where are they taking the survivors?" - Withholding information sign of sabotage.
• Captain and crew first to abandon ship - Sign of sabotage.
• Israel had the motive and the means to sabotage the ferry Al Salam 98.
• Hatred and cruelty of this magnitude is what the world has growned to expect from zioni$t$.
• Sinking of ferry will promote the war between Israel and/or USA against Iran.

February 3, 2006

Dispute Over Israel Delays Vote on Iran Nuclear Resolution

By ELAINE SCIOLINO
VIENNA, Feb. 3 — The 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency delayed a vote on a landmark resolution on Iran's nuclear program today largely because of American opposition to a clause indirectly criticizing Israel's nuclear weapons status, according to several diplomats.

The problem arose when Egypt insisted that the draft resolution include a specific mention of support for the creation of a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the Middle East.

Egypt and other Arab states routinely demand references to a "nuclear free zone" in the Middle East in Security Council documents, arguing that Israel — which has never admitted that it has nuclear weapons and unlike Iran has never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty — should be part of a general security framework in the Middle East that bans such weapons.

In the current debate, Egypt has argued that if a resolution is passed that makes the Security Council a player in considering Iran's nuclear program, it must include language about a nuclear-free Middle East.

"It's five against one," one European ambassador said.

Another key ambassador called the Americans "dogmatists."

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Survivors said they were ordered to take off lifejackets

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Hopes fade for ferry missing

Saturday 04 February 2006, 16:46 Makka Time, 13:46 GMT

The ferry was listing for two hours before sinking

Hopes of finding hundreds of passengers missing since their ferry sank in the Red Sea were fading on Saturday as the search for them entered a second day.

At least 185 bodies have been recovered and 389 survivors rescued from the waters where the 35-year-old ferry, Al Salam 98, sank on its journey to Safaga in Egypt from Duba in northwest Saudi Arabia, an official said.

The ferry was carrying 1272 passengers, mainly Egyptians, and 100 crew when it lost contact with the shore at about 10pm (2000 GMT) on Thursday.

Some of the survivors, recovering in an Egyptian hospital, said they spent up to 20 hours in rubber dinghies and holding on to life buoys waiting to be rescued.

The ferry, which the survivors said had thick smoke coming from it before it sank, had a complement of 100 crew when it lost contact with the shore at about 10pm (2000 GMT) on Thursday.

The survivors said the ferry had thick smoke coming from it before it sank. They said that it began listing to one side shortly after leaving Duba port in Saudi Arabia, but sailed on for two hours, before listing further and then rapidly sinking.

An official from the company that owned the ferry said coastal stations had not received a distress call.

One man, Gadir Muhammad, said: "They are not telling us anything. Where are the corpses? Where are they taking the survivors?"

Officials and experts initially said poor weather was likely to have caused the sinking, but Egypt's presidential spokesman suggested safety problems.

Majority of the passengers on board were Egyptians

A shipping company official said the Saudi authorities had confirmed that everything was in order when the ship sailed.

One expert said the ship had a loading mechanism for vehicles that could have let in water. Richard Clayton, news editor of the shipping weekly Fairplay, said: "If these doors are open for any reason, then you've had it."

MENA said the passenger list included 1158 Egyptians, as well as about a hundred others, including Saudis, Syrians, and a Canadian.

Captain was first to flee, say survivors

Saturday 04 February 2006, 16:17 Makka Time, 13:17 GMT

Survivors said they were ordered to take off lifejackets

Survivors of the Red Sea ferry disaster have said the captain and his crew were first to flee the ship by lifeboat and abandoned them to their fate.

Some passengers plucked alive from the sea or from boats after the ferry sank early on Friday said on Saturday that the crew had told them not to worry about a fire below deck and even ordered them to take off lifejackets.

The survivors said a fire broke out below deck shortly after the 35-year-old vessel left the Saudi port of Duba on Thursday evening.

Shihata Ali, an Egyptian survivor, said the passengers had told the captain about the fire but he told them not to worry.

"We were wearing lifejackets but they told us there was nothing wrong, told us to take them off and they took away the lifejackets," he said. "Then the boat started to sink and the captain took a boat and left."

Another survivor said: "The captain was the first to leave and we were surprised to see the boat sinking."

Other survivors also reported that the crew played down the gravity of the situation and withheld lifejackets.

Nadir Jalal Abd al-Shafi, another arrival on the same rescue boat, said: "There was a blaze down below. The crew said 'Don't worry, we will put it out'. When things got really bad the crew just went off in the lifeboats and left us on board."

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Letter to the Editor of Website Anti-War.com

I noticed the web site Anti-War.com is on its quarterly money drive. I am outraged Anti-War has not printed any articles, at least I have seen none, on the sinking of the Al Salam 98. It seems to me Anti-War is being bought off just as the mainstream media has been bought off and articles on touchy subjects that should be published and if so may save lives and help prevent war are not being published on Anti-War.com. Tell me one more time how much courage Anti-War.com has. Mr. Courageous Anti-War may not publish this but I will.

Randy Crow
randycrow@randycrow.com

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Responce from the websire Anti-War.com to my Letter to the Editor

>Please direct me to any articles on the Ferry sinking that are
>related to foreign policy and we would be happy to publish
>them. My impression is that this is an issue of a very
>irresponsible company, not the result of military intervention or threats.

If I am mistaken please tell me how.

> >
> > Randolph W. Crow has a letter for the editor..here
> > are the results!
> > Noticed Anti-War was asking for money again. I am
> > outraged Anti-War has not printed any articles, at
> > least I have seen none, on the sinking of the Al
> > Salam 98. It seems to me Anti-War is being bought
> > off just as the mainstream media has been bought off
> > and articles on touchy subjects that should be
> > published and if so may save lives and help prevent
> > war are not being published on Anti-War.com. Tell me
> > one more time how much courage Anti-War.com has. Mr.
> > Courageous Anti-War may not publish this but I will.
> >
> >
> > Randy Crow
> > randycrow@randycrow.com
> >
> > Submitter's email address: randycrow@randycrow.com
> >
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

2-7-06

Hello Mr. Garris,

Thank you for responding to my e-mail. Here are some of my reasons I feel
the sinking of the ferry Al Salam 98 is deliberate sabotage which I will
include in my next writing which I send around to my e-mail list and will
post on randycrow.com. By the way I am an expert on detecting dirty deeds
and conspiracies. Many of my opinions are based upon logic but in the
fullness of time have proven to be very accurate. The only place I have
found anything intelligently written about the ferry disaster, which is
approaching the magnitude of the Titanic disaster, is Aljazeera.net.

Randy

Why do we know the sinking of the Al Salam 98 was deliberate and sabotage
and the zioni$t are responsible?

The ferry Al Salam 98 listed for two hours before sinking and there were
below deck fires. It is easy to make a ship list. Load the ship improperly.
Either fill or drain water from its water tanks. Fires are easy to start.
The saboteurs made the ship list and started fires to try and make the
sinking of the Al Salam 98 appear as if it was not sunk by saboteurs. Since
the Al Salam 98 did not turn around and head back to Duba when it had a
serious safety situation we know its sinking was the work of zioni$t
saboteurs.

Almost no media coverage in the United States regarding the sinking of the
Al Salam 98 in which 900 Egyptians drown. A deliberate sinking by Israel of
a ferry carrying Egyptians is the type of news the USA would not give the
American people to keep Americans uninformed of the real reasons and those
responsible for starting the imminent war between Israel and/or the USA
against Iran.

Egypt insisted a clause criticizing Israel's nuclear weapons status be
included in the International Atomic Energy Agency landmark resolution on
Iran's nuclear program and logic dictates Israel would sabotage the Al Salam
98 in retaliation.

Survivors not rescued for twenty hours - Only a well planned deliberate
sinking of the ship would result in a rescue delay of 20 hours.

No distress signal given - Sign of sabotage.

No details are being released on the sinking of the Al Salam 98. Where are
the corpses? Where are they taking the survivors?" - Withholding information
sign of sabotage.

Captain and crew first to abandon ship - Sign of sabotage.

Israel had the motive and the means to sabotage the ferry Al Salam 98.

Hatred and cruelty of this magnitude is what the world has growned to expect
from zioni$t$.

Sinking of ferry will promote the war between Israel and/or USA against
Iran.

How Hipocritical can the Little George Administration Get?

“US policy seeks to encourage China to choose a path of peaceful economic growth and political liberalisation, rather than military threat and intimidation,” the review states.

Pentagon sees China as greatest potential rival

The Pentagon should not be trying to conquer the world. The Pentagon on the direction of the Little George Administration is engaging in military threat and intimidation and for some illogical reason does not realize the Pentagon's warring ways is not going to lead to warring ways from China, India, and Russia? How out to lunch and illogical can the Pentagon get? Did the world ignore Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin? Nope. The world is not going to ignore the comrade Anti-Christ, his Pentagon, Big George's NWO and the $ulzberger zioni$t$, either.

China has the “greatest potential to compete militarily” with America in the future, but the US is also increasingly worried about Russian arms sales, the Pentagon said in major review of military priorities.

Underscoring mounting concerns about the rise of China, the highly anticipated quadrennial defence review [QDR] focusses on the potential future threat from a Chinese military build-up that “already puts regional military balances at risk”.

The report says Russia is “unlikely to pose a military threat to the US or its allies on the same scale or intensity as the Soviet Union during the Cold War”. But the Pentagon warns on Russian sales of “disruptive weapons” and actions that “compromise the political and economic independence and territorial integrity of other states”.

Although the Pentagon made similar warnings in its annual report on the Chinese military last year, the prominent mention in the QDR - essentially a statement to Congress of how it will structure the US military to meet international threats - underscores the Bush administration view that China represents its biggest long-term conventional military rival.

“US policy seeks to encourage China to choose a path of peaceful economic growth and political liberalisation, rather than military threat and intimidation,” the review states.

“The United States’ goal is for China to continue as an economic partner and emerge as a responsible stakeholder and force for good in the world.” At the same time, it highlights a decade of rapidly increasing Chinese defence spending, and criticises the secrecy of Beijing’s military planning, saying the outside world remains in the dark over Chinese motivations and capabilities, particularly with regard to Taiwan.

Chinese military modernisation has accelerated since the mid-to-late 1990s in response to central leadership demands to develop military options against Taiwan scenarios,” it states.

The report says China’s increased military capability, and the size of the country coupled with the geography of Asia, means the US will have to develop weapons systems and force postures that “place a premium on [US] forces capable of sustained operations at great distances into denied areas”. This is military-speak for ships and aircraft that can stealthily observe, and if necessary attack, after operating in hostile territory for long periods.

Such weapons, which include unmanned fighter planes, space-based spy satellites, and stealthy warships that can operate in shallow waters, are all given priority among the conventional weapons supported by the QDR.