Bait and Switch - Plus: Neocon's Ace in the Hole for Attacking Iran - zioni$t$' Ability To Crash Stock Markets - Plus: Bad Guys Murder Molly Ivins

2-2-07

Bait and Switch When the US Congress gave the Neocons authority to invade Afghanistan and Iraq (illegal according to International Law), military authority was given for the purpose of sending US troops to make war against Saddam Hussein Sunni Baathist communi$t al-Queda terrorists. Even though it is illegal and a War Crime to invade a country and murder citizens for racism or to steal their oil, the US Congress gave comrade Little George permission to do so because al-Queda live in Iraq, they are Sunni communi$t$, and it is/was alleged al-Queda is/was responsible for September 11, 2001. It has never been alleged, implied, or stated in any form or fashion that Iran had anything to do with September 11. Al-Queda are Saddam Hussein Sunni Baathist communi$t$. Iran is Saddam Hussein's Sunni Baathist communi$t$' sworn enemy. Saddam Hussein's Sunni Baathist communi$t$ fought a five year war against Iran in which 1.5 million brave Arab and Persian kids were killed. Why did Big George and the Neocons manipulate and finance the Iraq-Iran War? Muslims are peaceful people and it is against the Muslim religion to kill and fight war. Neocons have always planned to steal Arab oil, give it to the zioni$t$, and make the region a zioni$t communi$tic totalitarian police state. Neocons knew in order to spread communi$m throughout the Mid East it was necessary to create hatred between Sunni and Shiites. Neocons financed and manipulated the Iraq-Iran War to create the hatred between Sunni and Shiites.

The Iran Contra Affair should really be named the Iraq Contra Affair. The arms sold were to Iraq and not Iran. Big George named the Affair Iran Contra to hide the fact a Neocon led USA was supplying Saddam Hussein Sunni Baathist communi$t$' arms. The Big George lie machine tossed in the mix Contra because Contra is alleged to be fighting a good cause - communi$m, and comrade Big George always tries to hide the fact he is a dye in the wool communi$t. The Iran Crisis was Big George manipulated to get oil prices up and Reagan elected. comrade Big George going to great lengths' to distance himself from Saddam Hussein communi$t$ reinforces the fact Big George is a communi$t with much to hide.

A Neocon led USA financed and supplied Saddam Hussein military equipment to make war against Iran. The Neocon led USA supplied the gas Saddam Hussein used to gas Kurds and Iranians. Neocons have been and still are on the side of Saddam Hussein. Why? Saddam Hussein and Sunni Baathists are communi$t$. Neocons are communi$t$. Neocon deception tries to convince Americans and everyone a Neocon led USA is against Saddam Hussein. The facts support the opposite. Neocons financed and brought Saddam Hussein to power. Neocons blow up a statue of Saddam Hussein and hurl words against Saddam Hussein Sunni Baathist communi$t fanatical skin head followers and bullets against non communi$t Iranians. Saddam Hussein's enemy, Iran, is now the Neocons' led US military's enemy. comrade Little George, comrade Cheney, and the Neocons through Ottie $ulzberger propaganda have changed the enemy 180 degrees from al-Queda communi$t$ to Iranian non communi$t$.The reason the New York Times and big media do not discuss with the American people who our enemy really is is because Neocons do not want the American people to see the Administration's bait and switch strategy which will take the USA from a one country war against communi$t to a world war to spread communi$m. The USA might as well attack Russia, India, and China at the same time as the USA attacks Iran because all four are allies.

The Little George Administration sending our brave soldiers to die fighting a different enemy than the US Congress authorized the US military to fight is racism and treason and an outrage. The picture above right clearly shows bombs placed in WTC 7 building exploding, and WTC-7 was not even hit by a plane September 11, 2001. If the Neocons have the power to keep this photo from the American people which clearly refutes the Neocon version of September 11, would the communi$t$' hesitate not to tell Americans their brave kids are dying fighting along side of Saddam Hussein Sunni Baathist communi$t$ against non communi$t Iran? Nope. A major key to the communi$t$' success lies in racism. At the behest of Neocons US media works hard to promote racism. Illegal aliens is a big issue to foster racism. The gay marriage amendment issue is Neocon created to promote bigotry and hatred among Americans. Just as the communi$t$ promote hatred between Sunni and Shiites, Neocons promote racism and bigotry in the USA to foment war. War, racism, bigotry, and skin head mentality are key tools Neocons use to manufacture war. Why do the Neocons manufacture war? Neocon manufactured war set the stage for Neocons to steal money, overturn the US Constitution, and place the world in their totalitarian communi$t police state fiefdom.

The bill giving comrade Little George authority to invade Iraq and Afghanistan specifically names the USA enemy as Saddam Hussein Sunni al-Queda in Iraq and Sunni Baathist al-Queda in Afghanistan.

It is easy to point out the bait and switch, al-Queda enemy changes to Iran Shiite enemy, aspect of Little George and the Neocons war. It is difficult to get this message to the American people. What the Neocons are doing would be the equivalent of the 1860 US Congress giving President Lincoln war powers to conduct a war against the South and after three years President Lincoln announces he is directing the US military to make war against the North. comrade Cheney also has the gaul to say the US Congress does not have the power to stop him, them. When the US Congress and the American people do not have power to start and stop war, the US Constitution has been overthrown and the American people are living in a totalitarian communi$t dictatorship.

Did Thomas Jefferson and true Americans who formed this country realize bad guys would try and steal America away from the people and enslave them? Yep. Jefferson's stay in France during the French Revolution opened his eyes to zioni$t Rothchild and his evil ways. Did Thomas Jefferson trust an elected US Congress to guarantee freedom? Nope. Jefferson knew Jack Abramoff types possibly could get the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches to do what Neocons want - put the US under Marshall Law, shred the US Constitution, rule the USA with a dictator. Jefferson included two main guarantees in the US Constitution which reached beyond the Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary. Freedom of speech. Jefferson believes that if you tell the people the problems, the people will solve the problem. Everyone has a vote. Jefferson believes that if all the people are part of the freedom, the un landed least to loose Americans could, would, will rise up and fight the wars the much to loose rich landed would be hesitant to fight. Two aspects of the US Constitution reach beyond the Executive, Legislative, Judicial and Abramoff zioni$t communi$t$ - informing the people, including all the people. Many of those crafting the US Constitution wanted to limit the people which the US Constitution protected to the landed. Slavery appeased those founding fathers for they felt it opened the door to change the Constitution to strip voting rights from those Americans who do not own land.

communi$m is the Satanic zioni$t communi$t answer to Mr. Jefferson's inclusion of un landed in the Constitution. Un landed given a choice of a communi$t system without a vote or the American system with a vote will choose the US Constitution and the right to vote every time.

The US Constitution gives the US Congress in Article I. Section. 8. the power to declare war. The US Congress has the power to change the war, redefine the war, order our military back home, at any time - Contrary to comrade Cheney's position. The US Congress has the power to declare war one day and un declare war the next day. In this case the President would be Commander in Chief for one day. The US Congress also has control of the purse strings. Article I., Section.2. of the US Constitution. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army..., when called into the actual Service of the United States; (when the US Congress declares War.) comrade Little George is committing treason as I write because he has assumed the position of Commander in Chief at a time the US Congress has not declared War and comrade Little George is not the Commander in Chief until the US Congress declares War. The US Congress is committing treason as I write for allowing comrade Little George assume the position of Commander in Chief when they have not declared War. Basically the USA is in a state of Civil War as I write and the power to rule has fallen back to the people because the US Congress, the Executive and Judiciary are engaging in War in direct violation of the US Constitution.

comrade Cheney makes an argument for war when he says the US Congress does not have a better idea. A better idea for what? A war against al-Queda which changes to a world war against Iran, Russia, India, and China.

comrade Cheney says "The fact is, we can complete the task in Iraq. We're going to do it." comrade Cheney has not even defined the task. comrade Cheney says "We are moving forward. The Congress has control over the purse strings. They have the right, obviously, if they want, to cut off funding," Cheney said Wednesday in an occasionally testy CNN interview. Yes, the US Congress has the power of the purse and the power to stop the war dead in its tracks by decree. The US Congress has the right to take back the money for war, redefine the war, and file charges of treason against comrade Little George, comrade Cheney if the President and VP do not do as Congress tells them to do. The people now have the right and are expected to do what the US Congress, the Executive, and Judiciary are supposed to be doing and are not.

Why are the Neocons forging away with their treason? Why are Neocons not afraid of making war against the states at the risk of treason punishable by death? The Neocons are playing poker and bluffing. Neocons believe zioni$t$ control the members of the US Congress. Neocons believe they control the media. Neocons believe they can crash the stock markets at any time. Neocons believe they can kill everyone so how can they get caught or loose?

My advice to Neocons is this. "There is a lot of slip from the sip to the lip." For the Neocons' plans to work Neocons are going to have to kill every single true American, a formidable task. Neocons are going to have to defeat Russia, India, and China and Iran, all 3.5 billion of them. Neocons' tricks require deception. With the advent of the Internet it is difficult to deceive all people. Neocons, Executive, Legislative and Judiciary are going to have to make sure I am never elected president because they know the entire bunch will be indicted for making War on the States and if convicted they will get the needle. Of course at this time I know I have no chance of being elected president. Voters may have a change of attitude however if half of the world's population is either dead or dying and the world knows beyond a shadow of a doubt the bad guys will kill us all if I am not elected president. Clearly, if the good guys win, and remember if God is with us who can be against us, and God is with us, the US Constitution is a carte blanch to take the names of Neocons, whether Billy Kristol, Ron Gunsberger, Ottie $ulzberger, members of the US Congress, Executive, and Judiciary any anyone making war on the USA, and punish them beyond their wildest dreams.

Cheney: Senate Resolution "Won't Stop Us"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/25/politics/main2397224.shtml

WASHINGTON, Jan. 25, 2007

Vice President Dick Cheney said critics of the administration's Iraq strategy "have not suggested a policy — they haven't put anything in place." (AP) Quote
"The fact is, we can complete the task in Iraq. We're going to do it."

(CBS/AP) The White House reaction to the Senate resolution opposing President Bush's decision to send more troops to Iraq came from Vice President Dick Cheney. In a word, he was defiant, saying about the general idea of a resolution, "It won't stop us."

"We are moving forward. The Congress has control over the purse strings. They have the right, obviously, if they want, to cut off funding," Cheney said Wednesday in an occasionally testy CNN interview.

Sun Tuz states in his book "The Art of War" that in order to win a war the General must position his army where his soldiers cannot run. Tuz suggest putting the army with their backs to the ocean. Neocons are putting their army in position. Three carrier battle fleets in the tiny Gulf of Iran. Nuclear subs with nuclear warheads circling. When all the troops are in position what will trigger the first shot. My guess? Stock markets free falling. Neocons are banking on American people faced with the choice of fighting a wrong war which may kill millions or billions of people or loosing their money will choose War. The zioni$t$' ability to crash the stock markets at will is their hole card.

zzzzzzzzz

Bad Guys Murder Molly Ivins, Age 62

God, impartial power, did Little George and the Neocon bad guys deliberately murder Molly Ivins by slipping her a dose of cancer?

--- ---
--- ---
------- * --- ---
--- ---
-------
--- --- * -------

40 Release Changes to 19 Overseeing

Release - Thunder and rain perform their roles: this is the image of Release. shrubs burgeon forth.

Changes to 19 Overseeing - Above the lake, there is the earth; this constitutes the image of Lin. In the same way, the noble woman is both inexhaustible in her powers to edify others and feel concern for them and limitless in her practice of magnamity and protection toward the common folk. Here one does not rely on control by military might but instead obtains the trust of others. But by the eight month there will be misfortune, because it, the yang principle, the Dao of the noble woman, wanes and does not last forever. The dao of the petty man is increasing, and the Dao of the noble woman is deteriorating. This is why the text says: "There will be misfortune."

This is a good example of Little George and the zioni$t communi$t$ vision of the world. If we don't praise them then they kill us. My read of the I Ching points to the bad guys' slipping Molly Ivins a dose of cancer.

January 27, 2007
Bush Is About to Attack Iran
Why Can't Americans See it?
by P C R
The American public and the US Congress are getting their backs up about the Bush Regime's determination to escalate the war in Iraq. A massive protest demonstration is occurring in Washington DC today, and Congress is expressing its disagreement with Bush's decision to intensify the war in Iraq.

This is all to the good. However, it misses the real issue – the Bush Regime's looming attack on Iran.

Rather than winding down one war, Bush is starting another. The entire world knows this and is discussing Bush's planned attack on Iran in many forums. It is only Americans who haven't caught on. A few senators have said that Bush must not attack Iran without the approval of Congress, and postings on the Internet demonstrate world wide awareness that Iran is in the Bush Regime's cross hairs. But Congress and the Media – and the demonstration in Washington – are focused on Iraq.

What can be done to bring American awareness up to the standard of the rest of the world?

In Davos, Switzerland, the meeting of the World Economic Forum, a conference where economic globalism issues are discussed, opened January 24 with a discussion of Bush's planned attack on Iran. The Secretary General of the League of Arab States and bankers and businessmen from such US allies as Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates all warned of the coming attack and its catastrophic consequences for the Middle East and the world.

Writing for Global Research, General Leonid Ivashov, vice president of the Academy on Geopolitical Affairs and former Joint Chief of Staff of the Russian Armies, forecasted an American nuclear attack on Iran by the end of April. General Ivashov presented the neoconservative reasoning that is the basis for the attack and concluded that the world's protests cannot stop the US attack on Iran.

There will be shock and indignation, General Ivashov concludes, but the US will get away with it. He writes:

"Within weeks from now, we will see the informational warfare machine start working. The public opinion is already under pressure. There will be a growing anti-Iranian militaristic hysteria, new information leaks, disinformation, etc.... The probability of a US aggression against Iran is extremely high. It does remain unclear, though, whether the US Congress is going to authorize the war. It may take a provocation to eliminate this obstacle (an attack on Israel or the US targets including military bases). The scale of the provocation may be comparable to the 9/11 attack in NY. Then the Congress will certainly say 'Yes' to the US president."

The Bush Regime has made it clear that it is convinced that Bush already has the authority to attack Iran. The Regime argues that the authority is part of Bush's commander-in-chief powers. Congress has authorized the war in Iraq, and Bush's recent public statements have shifted the responsibility for the Iraqi insurgency from al-Qaeda to Iran. Iran, Bush has declared, is killing US troops in Iraq. Thus, Iran is covered under the authorization for the war in Iraq.

Both Bush and Cheney have made it clear in public statements that they will ignore any congressional opposition to their war plans. For example, CBS News reported (Jan. 25) that Cheney said that a congressional resolution against escalating the war in Iraq "won't stop us." According to the Associated Press, Bush dismissed congressional disapproval with his statement, "I'm the decision-maker."

Everything is in place for an attack on Iran. Two aircraft carrier attack forces are deployed to the Persian Gulf, US attack aircraft have been moved to Turkey and other countries on Iran's borders, Patriot anti-missile defense systems are being moved to the Middle East to protect oil facilities and US bases from retaliation from Iranian missiles, and growing reams of disinformation alleging Iran's responsibility for the insurgency in Iraq are being fed to the gullible US media.

General Ivashof and everyone in the Middle East and at the Davos globalization conference in Europe understands the Bush Regime's agenda.

Why cannot Americans understand?

Why hasn't Congress told Bush and Cheney that they will both be instantly impeached if they initiate a wider war?

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

January 31, 2007
The Crime of the Century

by P C R
President George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq is the greatest crime of the 21st century.

Armed with a powerful moral case against Bush, whose lies are responsible for a war that has caused thousands of U.S. casualties and killed vast numbers of Iraqi civilians, Democratic leaders are damning Bush's war because it did not succeed!

The Bush regime lied and fabricated "evidence" that was used to deceive Congress, the American people, and the United Nations. The vice president of the United States and the national security adviser created public images of mushroom clouds going up over American cities unless Iraq was invaded and Saddam Hussein's terrible weapons of mass destruction were destroyed.

At the time that these absurd claims were being made, experts knew that they were false. Today everyone knows that the claims were lies.

The invasion of Iraq under false pretenses comprises solid grounds for impeaching both Bush and Cheney and for turning them over to the War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague. Under the Nuremberg standard, to commit unprovoked aggression is a war crime.

Among the consequences of Bush's monstrous war crime are the deaths of tens or hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, the destruction of Iraqi civilian infrastructure, the outbreak of civil war between Iraqi Sunnis and Shi'ites, the spreading of this sectarian conflict throughout the Middle East, and the consequent destabilization of the region.

Try to imagine all the lives, careers, hopes, and families that Bush has destroyed. Try to imagine the fate of the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees, the departure of educated and skilled Iraqis from Iraq, the ultimate horror of civil war that is only beginning.

Official U.S. casualties (dead, wounded, and maimed) at time of writing total 26,194. Experts have estimated the cost of the invasion and attempted occupation to be in excess of the enormous sum of 1,000 billion dollars.

This expenditure has made profits for Vice President Cheney, for Cheney's firm, Halliburton, for the U.S. military-industrial complex, and for private contractors, but it has done nothing whatsoever for Americans. Sen. Frank Lautenberg reports that "Halliburton has already raked in more that $10 billion" from the Iraq war and that the value of Cheney's Halliburton stock options has jumped from $241,498 to more than $8,000,000.

Moreover, the cost of Bush's aggression in Iraq has been covered by red ink and foreign borrowing, which is financially punishing every American by pushing down the value of the dollar and pushing up the tax burden to service the war debt.

The conclusion is unavoidable that Bush has committed a massive crime against Iraqis, against the Middle East, against American citizens and military families, and against America's reputation.

Finally coming to their senses and realizing the pointlessness of Bush's war, the American people gave the Democratic Party control over the House and Senate in the hopes that the Democrats would put a stop to Bush's war.

Was the electorate's faith in the Democrats justified?

Listen to the Democrats' statements and judge for yourself.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden declared on ABC's This Week that "it's the failed policy of this president, going to war without a strategy, going to war prematurely, going to war without enough troops, going to war without enough equipment."

Sen. Hillary Clinton, a likely Democratic candidate for president, says, "This was his decision to go to war with an ill-conceived plan and an incompetently executed strategy."

The Democrats are damning Bush not for his monstrous crime but for failing at it!

Instead of holding Bush accountable for his crimes with impeachment proceedings, Hillary Clinton merely wants Bush to get rid of the problem so she will not be troubled with it on her watch: "We expect him to extricate our country from this before he leaves office." Hillary says it would be "the height of irresponsibility" for Bush to pass the war along to the next president.

A moral, humane, decent, honest person would define "the height of irresponsibility" as the act of taking two countries to war on the basis of lies and deception.

Now that Bush and Cheney have lost their war due to their incompetence and faulty execution, the Democrats are going to pass a nonbinding resolution against escalating the war in Iraq. While Congress negotiates a posture on the Iraq war, the Bush regime moves forward with its plans to attack Iran.

Everyone can see the U.S. buildup of massive air and naval attack forces on Iran's borders. Fox "News," the Bush regime's main disinformation agency, is busy preparing its viewers for the U.S. attack by whipping up fear and hysteria over Iran. The Bush regime suddenly changed its line and now blames Iran instead of al-Qaeda for its defeat in Iraq. The Israel Lobby is working around the clock for a U.S. strike on Iran. On Jan. 30 Bush again threatened that he will respond firmly if Tehran escalates its involvement in Iraq.

Bush's threats are part of the propaganda that is creating an excuse that Bush can use to attack Iran.

Bush plans to bomb Iran. U.S. war doctrine has been altered to allow Bush to use nuclear weapons to attack Iran. American neoconservatives and Israel's right wing have argued in behalf of attacking Iran with nuclear weapons, and a number of foreign experts are forecasting such an attack.

While Bush prepares in public view his war on Iran, the Democrats turn a blind eye. For the Democrats the only issue is whether or not Bush should send 21,500 more U.S. troops to Iraq.

The issue is whether the war in Iraq can be quickly ended, or Bush and Cheney impeached, before the two war criminals create a more monstrous crime and a more dangerous situation for America and the world by attacking Iran.