Untitled Document

1-19-09

Louie Freeh, Sept. 11 Lead Operative, Urges Confirmation of Holder

It is funny how, if you live long enough, the pieces of the puzzle come together. When the FBI drove Bruce Ivins to kill himself last summer, it made me realize Louie Freeh was responsible for, or rather a big man in charge of 911. Why did the FBI murder Ivins last year? Well they knew Ivins could nail them for being responsible for the Sept 11 anthrax attacks which leads to their involvement with 911 itself. The FBI wanted this liability gone in case when Obama took office there were changes in the FBI which could put Freeh at risk if Ivins were still alive. Too bad, so sad, Bruce you are dead.

I Ching What is the significance of Louie Freeh's involvement in September 11?

6 Contention changes to 64 Unsettled - Bright on the outside while dark on the inside, causing downfall by brightness, producing brightness because of danger, Yin and yang are awry, and do not correspond, this is called unsettled.

Contention - Blockage of truth, Finality leads to bad results, contention to decide right and wrong. Relying on strength because of danger, and causing danger by force, both have the meaning of violation of harmony; this is called contention.

------
------ * --- ---
-----
--- ---
------
--- ---

Anthrax and 911 are two peas in a pod. If you solve one, you solve them both. Anthrax is much easier to solve than 911, and the anthrax attacks have the FBI written all over them. So if the FBI are in on, responsible for the anthrax attacks, then logic dictates the FBI is in on at least partially responsible for 911. Of course when I say the FBI is responsible for anthrax and 911, I really mean an extremely small cell of the FBI, not the vast number of FBI employees who love the United States and cheerfully die for the USA. In my opinion this cell of the FBI which does dirty deeds, anthrax, 911, school kid murders, the DC snipers, downing of planes, is connected to or directed by Louie Freeh.

So the question becomes, Why does Louie Freeh want Eric Holder the US Attorney General? Logic dictates Louie Freeh does not want to get nailed for 911 possibly most of all. So there is something about Eric Holder that gives Louie Freeh confidence Eric Holder will never connect the dots between Louie Freeh and 911. Louie Freeh was chosen to lead the FBI and to be a Big Man in the anthrax attacks and also 911 because Freeh lived in NYC and the bad guys knew NYC was going to be an important city to have a man in charge who was well connected with the NYC legal system, as Freeh is. Holder is from NYC as well and this may be a major reason Freeh wants Holder US Attorney General. There are many NYC people suffering from the nuclear waste associated with the blowing up of the buildings, and it is tricky business ignoring these suffering people. One case in court could open up an investigation of all of 911, something Freed definitely does not want to happen.

Louie Freeh is still manipulating school kid murders. School kid murders could also be called the bad guys method of getting the guns away from the people. Obama and Holder both want the guns from the people so Obama, Holder and Louie Freeh are on the same team working to get the guns from the people. From the days of J. Edger Hoover the FBI has ruled a good bit of the USA by gathering smut on powerful people. Even though 50% of the American people are outraged by Israel's conduct against Hamas and the Palestinians, basically 100% of the members of the US Congress support Israel's War Crimes against Arabs. There is only one reason for this nonsense. Some entity is directing the members of the US Congress to support Israel 100%. Logic dictates that entity, the smut collectors, is the FBI. So another reason Freeh may want Eric Holder US Attorney General is the file on Holder may be so filled with smut Holder will dance the FBI jig forever. Who knows. However, I have found the only way for me to determine who to support and not support is to determine who the bad guys support, and be against who the bad guys want. Freeh is a bad guy. Freeh supports Holder. Therefore I am against Holder.

Holder's connect to Barbados is highly interesting since many of the wealthy slave trade families which developed the United States before the Revolution lived in Barbados before moving permanently to the Carolinas and Virginia. No telling whose blood is running through Holder's veins or what his attitude is toward slavery and descendents of those who once lived in Barbados.

The Rothschilds and Rockefellers are the bad guys who own our banking system and they also have developed communi$m. The bad guys put Little George in Office and also put Obama in Office. The bad guys also manipulated our recent economic meltdown. Where this leads while Obama is president is multiple guess but logic dictates life for Americans is going to get much worse. The economic meltdown could lead to so much misery people revolt and this may be when the bad guys install Martial Law. There has got to be a reason why the bad guys directed Little George shred the US Constitution and why the bad guys made Obama president, a guy with communi$t leanings and not legally eligible, since both his parents were not US citizens, to be US president. If the United States becomes a communi$t police state in the next few years the US Attorney General will have to be involved. Certainly I, and we, cannot sleep easily knowing Holder and Freeh are friends.

Jan 16, 2009 11:30 am US/Eastern
FBI Director Urges Confirmation Of Holder
Support From Republicans Should Give Holder Enough Votes To Avoid Filibuster

Attorney General nominee Eric Holder testifies during his confirmation hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill on Jan. 15, 2009, in Washington DC.

http://kdka.com/national/eric.holder.confirmation.2.910080.html

Freeh's endorsement came during the second and final day of confirmation hearings before the committee.

As the panel questioned witnesses, Holder met with Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla. Martinez issued a statement after the hearing saying he would vote for Holder.

Martinez's support, combined with that of Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, should give Holder enough votes to avoid a filibuster challenge, assuming all the Senate Democrats support him.

"The prospects are probably good that he will be confirmed," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. No Republican senator has yet come out against the nominee.

At the confirmation hearing, Freeh said Holder had made "terrible mistakes" leading up to President Bill Clinton's pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich. Freeh called the Rich pardon "a corrupt act" but said the corruption was not Holder's.

"I don't think it's fair to put that blame totally on Eric Holder," said Freeh. "He takes responsibility and he will never make that mistake again."

Holder was also supported at the hearing by Frances Townsend, who was President George W. Bush's homeland security adviser.

She said she does not expect to agree with every decision he would make as the nation's top law enforcement officer, but believes his choices will be fair and honestly made.

"I know Eric to be an honest, decent man of the highest ethical standards," she said.

Senators then heard emotional testimony from Joseph Connor, the son of a man slain in a 1975 bombing in New York City by a militant Puerto Rican independence group called the Armed Forces for National Liberation.

President Bill Clinton granted clemency to 16 members of that group, and Holder has been criticized for his role in the decision.

Connor urged lawmakers to oppose "anybody who would be soft on terror."

Holder "never talked to us," Connor said, urging lawmakers not to confirm "this man who recommended playing Russian roulette" with American lives by releasing unrepentant terrorists.

The witness testimony lasted two hours, and the committee was expected to vote on Holder's nomination next week.

In his appearance before the committee a day earlier, Holder said the president's decision on the FALN members was "reasonable."

Most of his testimony, though, focused on how he would oversee U.S. legal and counterterrorism policy.

Holder declared waterboarding to be a form of torture, and outlined numerous ways in which the incoming Obama administration will break sharply with the Bush administration's counterterrorism policies.

The 57-year-old former prosecutor who was deputy attorney general from 1997 to 2001 pledged to shut down the U.S. naval prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in part by sending detainees to trial in the United States, and restore the Justice Department's reputation of independence from political interference.

Holder told lawmakers he did not believe the attorney general's job was to serve as the president's lawyer-a frequent criticism of Gonzales' tenure under Bush. He also vowed to see how much harm has been done to the department by political scandals.

"One of the things I'm going to have to do as attorney general in short order is basically do a damage assessment," Holder said.

At the hearing, many Republicans chose not to aggressively attack Holder, despite pre-hearing bluster that they would challenge his record as a Clinton administration official and flex their muscle as the minority party.

"I'm almost ready to vote for you right now," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., after Holder agreed with the senator that the nation is at war with terrorists.

It was a similar story in other Senate hearings for Obama's picks to oversee the Homeland Security and Interior departments-Janet Napolitano and Ken Salazar, respectively. Both their hearings ended shortly after noon with no verbal fireworks.

Holder's testimony was just the latest sign that Obama will chart a different course than Bush in combatting terrorism. Obama plans to issue an executive order to close Guantanamo.

Holder said shuttering the prison would be difficult and would take time. Many detainees could be transferred to other countries, he said, and some could be charged and jailed in the U.S. That is a contentious proposal because many oppose the idea of bringing terrorism suspects onto U.S. soil.

The incoming Obama administration has not indicated what would happen to the detainees who were transferred to the United States. Holder said the administration was considering prosecuting the detainees in civilian courts, military courts or in some new hybrid court.

Why the FBI Murdered Bruce Ivins

Bad Guys Manipulate Georgia War to Get Bruce Ivins and Anthrax Out of the News

Why was Bruce Ivins, Stephen Hatfill and anthrax such a hot potato news item? Because people learned the anthrax came from a U.S. Government/Army research lab. The same Government lab where... the anthrax attacks themselves came from was the same place where false reports originated that blamed those attacks on Iraq. The same people responsible for perpetrating the attacks were the ones who fed the false reports to the public, through ABC News, that Saddam was behind them. The people who were responsible for the anthrax attacks and feeding the false reports to the media link to the people who are responsible for 911. We were learning the anthrax attacks and 911 were homegrown, and Arabs had nothing to do with either of them. We now know the FBI is involved with the anthrax attacks and this lets us assume the FBI is in on 911. Robert Mueller became head of the FBI July 5, 2001, right before 911. Louie Freeh may be the lead guy responsible for the anthrax attacks and 911, and he and the bad guys' decided Freeh must exit the scene before 911 as not to tie him with 911, and this is why Freeh exited the FBI two months before 911. Its been fun going after Freeh for years and it would be a pleasure to see him get the needle for being responsible for the anthrax and 911. A cell of the FBI was probably responsible for the DC sniper murders, and this is why one of the DC sniper murders was an FBI employee, who knew too much? Patrick Leahy is weighing in on the anthrax attacks. Leahy wants to know the motive as to why he was targeted for anthrax. So do I. The bad guys' fear Leahy. Leahy is very smart and a conspiracy nut. Things were getting too close to the truth. The bad guys had always planned a Georgia War so the bad guys pushed the Georgia War button and away goes Bruce Ivins and the anthrax news. Logic dictates Freeh will frame Mueller as responsible for the anthrax attacks and 911. My mind has told me before there was something fishy about Freeh leaving the FBI shortly before 911. It is that the FBI tie in with Hatfill and Ivins has triggered the Louie Freeh button again. Freeh is from NYC and the perfect guy to have been in charge of the anthrax murders and 911. Freeh has been in on some bad stuff through the years, Flight 800, and a very powerful guy. Freeh is the guy who went to Russia and talked to them after the USA nuked the Russia sub Kursk.