Let's prove Big George's New World Order is responsible for September 11, 2001.
5-24-09 Nano-thermite explosive used to bring down the building September 11. Click this link to learn more.
Voodoo brings down third building, WCT # 7 September 11. Why does not Ottie $ulzberger,owner of the NYTs, or Craig Moon, publisher of USAToday have their newspapers discuss the fact 3 buildings went down Sept 11?
Half-way through Building 7's 6.5-second plunge, streamers suggestive of demolition charges emerged from the facade.
Building 7 was the third skyscraper to be reduced to rubble on September 11, 2001. According to the government, fires, (from the planes that hit the two other WTC buildings jumped over to this third giant building. Can you believe the lies Little George's communi$t Administration is laying on the planet!) primarily, leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper.
The team that investigated the collapse were kept away from the crime scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report in May, 2002, the evidence had been destroyed.
Why did the government rapidly recycle the steel from the largest and most mysterious engineering failure in world history, and why has the media remained silent?
What Caused Building 7's Collapse? Magic? Voodoo? Big George's New World Order
placing bombs in it?
This question would appear to be the greatest in engineering history. In over
100 years of experience with steel frame buildings, fires have never caused
the collapse of a single one, even though many were ravaged by severe fires.
Indeed, fires have never caused the total collapse of any permanent steel structure.
What was done to answer this most important question? The only official body that admits to having investigated the curious collapse of Building 7 is FEMA's Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT), which blamed fires for the collapse but admitted to being clueless about how fires caused the collapse.
People who have seen buildings implode in controlled demolitions are unlikely to be as challenged as FEMA's team in understanding the cause of Building 7's collapse. They will notice, upon watching the videos, that Building 7's collapse showed all of the essential features of a controlled demolition.
Despite having the appearance of a controlled demolition, is it possible that Building 7 could have been destroyed by some combination of damage from tower debris, fuel tank explosions, and fires? Let's consider the possible scenarios.
NIST released a photograph in 2005 showing a large gouge in the lower portion of the southwest corner of Building 7, and its collapse scenario deviates significantly from FEMA's in emphasizing alleged structural damage from the collapse of the North Tower. That photograph is notable for its lack of corroboration, and NIST's claims of other regions of damage to the building's south face lack substantiating evidence. Even if NIST's claims about structural damage from North Tower debris were true, it would not begin to explain the precipitous, symmetrical manner in which Building 7 collapsed. Structural damage to the south side -- particularly to the lower stories -- would have made any kind of vertical collapse all the more unlikely.
The idea that diesel fuel stored in Building 7 is to blame for the collapse was promoted by The New York Times in late 2001 and by FEMA's 2002 Building Performance Study. 1 Â This idea is also untennable. Fires were observed in Building 7 prior to its collapse, but they were isolated in small parts of the building, and were puny by comparison to other building fires. Let's imagine, contrary to the evidence, that debris from the tower collapses damaged Building 7's structure, that diesel fuel tanks exploded, and that incredibly intense fires raged through large parts of the building. Could such events have caused the building to collapse? Not in the manner observed. The reason is that simultaneous and symmetric damage is needed to produce a collapse with the precise symmetry of the vertical fall of building 7. This building had 58 perimeter columns and 25 core columns. In order to cause the building to sink into its footprint all of the core columns and all of the perimeter columns would have to be broken in the same split-second.
Any debris from the towers impacting Building 7 would have hit its south side,
and any columns damaged by it would almost certainly be perimeter columns on
its south side. Any fuel tank explosion would only be able to damage nearby
structure. The rapid fall-off of blast pressures with distance from the source
would preclude any such event from breaking all of the columns in the building.
Building 7 was about 5 times as tall as it was deep.
(Furthermore the very idea of a tank of diesel fuel exploding taxes the imagination,
since diesel fuel does not even begin to boil below 320º F. 2 Â
) Fires have never been known to damage steel columns in highrise buildings,
but if they could, the damage would be produced gradually and would be localized
to the areas where the fire was the most intense.
No combination of debris damage, fuel-tank explosions, and fires could inflict the kind of simultaneous damage to all the building's columns required to make the building implode. The precision of such damage required to bring Building 7 down into its footprint was especially great given the ratio of its height to its width and depth. Any asymmetry in the extent and timing of the damage would cause such a building to topple.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
1. Engineers are Baffled Over the Collapse of 7 WTC, New York Times, 11/29/01
[cached]
2. DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS PIERCE TRANSIT DIESEL FUEL,
Highlights:
A giant third building, the media mentions only in fine print, World Trade Building # 7 falls Sept 11 in a controlled demolition fashion. Flight 93 was being flown by remote control to hit it as a cover for the demolition bombs placed in the building but's Flight 93's pilot (and I can't even find his name) will go down in history as one of America's greatest heros of all time ever because Flight 93's pilot, by figuring a way to override the remote control, crashed the plane in a field and eliminated the reason the building fell, a plane crashed into it, a given, the reason is as lame as can be, and thus the building obviously had demolition bombs placed in it to cause it to fall, proving dirty filthy coward Big George's Neocon communi$t$ are responsible for September 11, and not Arabs.
Timothy McNiven, a 29-year U.S. Defense Department employee still under contract with the government, says his military unit way back in 1976 devised a mock terrorist attack of the Twin Towers exactly like what occurred on 9/11.
NORAD as the capability to fly planes by remote control. (Because NORAD has the capability to take over the controls and fly planes by remote control France refuses to cooperate with NORAD. Remote control flying is logical considering planes have auto pilots which one would assume can and are being hacked.) Shortly before Sept. 11 NORAD ran exercises that tested track detection and identification; scramble and interception; hijack procedures; internal and external agency coordination and operational security and communications security procedures for planes hijacked from US cities and flown to DC and New York City with the Pentagon and Towers as targets. So the bad guys had a dress rehearsal of what happened Sept. 11 right before Sept. 11.
Bombs were placed in buildings. No way 20,000 gallons of jet fuel would cause an explosion this big and melt at least 60,000 feet of giant steel beams encased in concrete some of this footage 600 feet from the blast. Clean up people are sick and suffering from radiation type of diseases, mother's expectant 9-11-01 are giving birth to deformed children, and these health issues lead us to the logical assumption nuclear bombs were placed in the buildings. Administration gets EPA to give false reports saying there were no poisons in rubble when there were.
No way pilots would give up control of airplanes in 90 seconds. Planes would have been flown as defensive weapons. No way Cessna trained Arab pilots could take over airliners and fly them with the precision the planes were flown. Therefore, the planes were flown by remote control. Military's use of drones, unmanned planes flown by remote control, proves the technology exist to have flown the 911 planes by remote control.
Administration has blocked all investigations of September 11. Cheney threatens another terrorist attack, power black out ect., when people question the Administration's version of Sept. 11 or complain about their kids in the military dying in Iraq installing zioni$m communi$m in the Mid East.
Administration insists Moussaoui is tried in a military tribunal which indicates Administration is fearful of a fair trial and they may be using mind control, solitary confinement, & torture to block Moussaoui from testifying. ( 4-26-05 - Moussaoui confesses to playing part in 911 knowing to do so means he is killed. Obviously Moussaoui was tortured to confess because no person would confess to a crime that guarantees he is killed unless the confession comes as the result of pressure.)
Bush taps six for trial by military tribunal, 7-4-03. Forerunner decision so that it will not look at if President started using military tribunals just to keep the Moussaoui trial secrete. When the fed wanted to get rid of McVeigh, he was the first federal prisoner executed in 35 years, another fed prisoner was executed at about the same time to make it look as if the fed was not executing McVeigh just to be getting rid of him to hide the fact someone else master mined the Oklahoma City bombing.
Carlyle Corporation declared a $200 million dollar dividend four weeks before Sept.11. Big George works for Carlyle. Logic dictates Carlyle Big Wigs knew about September 11 and that Caryle would make money off September 11 and company declared dividend in anticipation of September 11 profits which would rebuild cash. No need to keep $200 million in cash when they knew September 11 cash was about to roll in.
October, 2001 Largest newspaper in world reported Bin Laden had been murdered. Logical Big George's NWO would want Bin Laden dead, so Bin Laden would not prove the NWO was responsible for Sept 11.
911 is a date which we all know represents Emergency. Can't you see Big George and the zioni$t$ slapping themselves on the back and laughing for their "Oh so Cleverness" having choosen a date for their evil which represents Emergency. September also is the start of Jewish Holy Season and zioni$t$ are known for doing an evil at the start of their new year which represents the type of evil they intend to engage during the new year.
8-11-06 Visited the web site www.scholarsfor911truth.org and
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholars find profoundly troubling:
In the history
of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings
have never been brought down due to fires either before or
since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one
day? How is this possible?
The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged
"hijackers" have turned up alive and well living
in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among
those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?
Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings
were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand
the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing
mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely
collapsed. How is this possible?
Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700°F, the
temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800°F
under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used
to 2,000°F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed
due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar
screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to
"reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon
shortly before impact. How is this possible?
Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate
hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know
that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting
its west wing. How is this possible?
Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground
bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate
a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer
to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The
order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been
the opposite. How is this possible?
A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed
that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should
have left debris scattered over an area less than the size
of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about
eight square miles. How is this possible?
A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers
on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small
pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total
destruction. How is this possible?
The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL"
simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on
24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has
repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined"
a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this
possible?
Their own physics research has established that only controlled
demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of
fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the
WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust,
they fell straight-down into their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to
conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of
the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the
President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."
4-16-06
Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. thinks VP Cheney may have been in charge of September 11
Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11 that simulated planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough to stop the attack.
"The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was part of the exercise," said Bowman
"I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that should be the object of investigation." Asked if he could name a prime suspect who was the likely architect behind the attacks, Bowman stated, "If I had to narrow it down to one person....I think my prime suspect would be Dick Cheney."
4-15-06 Bombs in the Towers 9/11 Problems Mount Article pertaining to the 30,000 or so people who sick as a dog from the nuclear radiation around the Towers when the bad guys set the bombs off to bring the Towers down September 11, 2001 via delayed action. The article blames the sick and dying on Trade Center dust and fails to mention bombs placed in the buildings. Turn on your brain for one minute. Do you really think for one minute two little bitty planes relative to the size of the buildings brought down two giant buildings and regular ole dust is now killing 30,000 five years later. Nope. And Little George wonders why the world does not believe him.
8-07-04
Karen Kwiatkowski wrote the following comments which are pretty cool. It did not take me long to figure out the Towers had to have nuclear bombs placed in them to bring them down and she gives a little proof to this fact. Cells phones don't work well on planes was new to me. Instantly I knew the planes had to have been flown by remote control and the CITCO camera discussion was new to me. Bad guys we are going to get you. One day. One of Little George's brothers was a part owner of a company or had a connect with a company that was in charge of the Towers' security and the same brother had some connect to the insurance company that wrote the terrorist policy a few weeks before Sept. 11 on the Towers. It was my thought that the bad guys would not let Little George even have an inkling about Sept. 11 for security reasons but I could be wrong. Certainly the reading to the class is about as weird as you can get.
From Karen (below)
I expected to hear how WTC 7 collapsed. The leaseholder of
the building told the media it was "pulled." I expected
to see more discussion of the mechanics of that presumably
unplanned demolition in the evening of 9-11 as well as the
collapse of the both 110-story towers, both impacted differently,
both falling almost identically. Do we have an engineering
design flaw no one knew about? It didn't’t come up in
the report.
The report refers to the many cell phone calls that were made
from the speeding airplanes, yet most people who have tried
to do this find that reception, cell switching software, and
other factors often prevent even a connection, much less a
conversation. The 9/11 commission should have taken the opportunity
to clear up that technological debate. It did not.
Why were the only gas stations mentioned those where terrorists were spotted before 9-11 – and not the Citgo directly in line with the Flight path of AA 77 as it aimed for the Pentagon? The security video from Citgo was confiscated by law enforcement – no hints as to what it recorded were provided in the Commission report. In fact, as the CITGO gas station employee noted, "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film." Sounds like the FBI had its eye on the ball, at least after the attacks!
5-18-04
The following link takes you to an article which discusses the fact that many 911 clean up workers are sick as a dog. By the way I said days after 911 bombs brought the towers down and people would be getting sick as a dog. Nuclear bombs in the towers and the planes flown by remote control point to an organization more technically advanced and working with a shadow government is responsible for 911, not Bin Laden and a few Arabs, as the Administration would like us to believe. If the Administration is going to lie to us about 911, Israel's involvement in the Abu Ghraib sexual prison torture scandal, the fact the Administration is putting Saddam Hussein's generals in charge of Iraq, one can assume almost everything we hear as truth from this Administration is a pack of lies.
5-08-04
The following is an interesting article and lends a little more proof that there is a cover-up going on relative to September 11. Hours after the planes were crashed Sept. 11 (flown by remote control, in my opinion) an alert FAA traffic control manager gathered six air control people who had either tracked or made verbal contact with the pilots of the four planes and recorded in a one-hour interview the air traffic controllers' personal accounts of what happen September 11. At this point in time, hours after the planes had crashed, the events of Sept. 11 were fresh on the air controllers' minds. Guess what? What happened next is exactly what one would expect in a conspiracy. The Sulzberger, Wolfie, Rover zioni$t communi$t responsible for Sept. 11 bad guys destroyed the tape.
How was it determined that an alert air traffic controller manager had made a tape of what happened Sept. 11 with the air controllers, the guys who know the truth about what happened Sept. 11, right after the planes were crashed? Some of the air controllers must have mentioned the tape to 911 Commission staff asking them what they heard Sept. 11 in conversations with the 911 planes' pilots and the 911 planes' paths, and lo and behold, no FAA brass has mentioned the tape before to the 911 Commission or anyone. A very important piece of evidence that proves the planes Sept. 11 were flown by remote control gone.
The fact some of the air traffic controllers mentioned the tape recording of their conversations with 911 pilots and 911 path work to 911 Commission staff investigating Sept. 11 leads one to assume FAA brass has changed what air traffic controllers said and what went on between air traffic controllers and 911 pilots in the official FAA report concerning air traffic controller conversations and path work Sept. 11.
An exchange between 911 Commission staff investigating Sept. 11 and some or all of the air traffic controllers who talked with the 911 pilots or followed the paths of the 911 planes must have gone about like this, "Mr. so and so air controller, you said this, that, and the other. No sir, that is not what I said at all. I said in fact this, this, and this and furthermore there is a tape that proves what I say is true."
911 Commission staff investigator responds, "We have never heard of any FAA tape you refer." Mr. Air Controller, "Well Mr. 911 Commission staff investigator, by God there is one." And after some detective work 911 Commission staff worker determines there was in fact a tape recording of 911 air traffic controllers' recollection of conversations between them and 911 pilots made within hours after the planes crashed Sept. 11, but it just so happens with anything that happens around a Bush, the tape was destroyed.
It would be nice for the public to hear what the air traffic controllers' told the 911 Commission about Sept. 11 that is different than the official FAA official version of that the FAA brass say the air traffic controllers' said. Since the 911 Commission is a cover-up of Sept. 11 just as the Warren Commission is a cover-up of the JFK murder which Big George is alleged to have been in charge, the chance is nil to minus 10 the Sulzberger type media has any interest in questioning the 911 Commission cover-up report as the Sulzbergers' type media are part of the conspiracy.
Hopefully a world is starting to realize how evil zioni$t communi$t Rumsfeld and company Neocons are because of of the Abu Ghraib prison torture sexual scandal and the lies and evil the Sulzbergers' type media lay on us daily through ommission and blair and one day the world will see Sept. 11 is a Wolfie Rover zioni$t communi$t Neocon manipulated mass murder also.
4-29-04
4-10-04 At long last, I am reading a little truth and it feels great. I love it, in a scenario mentioned in this article the planes were flown by remote control as I said like and I checked to may sure when I wrote it and it was published 9-13-01 It is my belief the planes may have been flown by remote control.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
OK
This is the math and a little bit of proof the downing of
the towers did not happen as the Administration & Wolfowiz
says it happened. Although at this time I do not know the
exact dimensions of the World Trade Buildings towers let say,
for a hypothetical situation, one of the towers was 200 feet
wide and 260 feet long and the giant beams which holds the
tower were on 20 foot centers. This would mean there 130 vertical
giant beams going up to the sixtieth floor where the plane
hit and exploded. If each floor is 10 feet tall that would
mean each vertical beam would be 600 feet from ground to where
the plane struck. So 600 feet times 130 beams would mean there
was a total of 78,000 running feet of giant I beams holding
up the tower. The reason the building fell down is these I
beams melted. Like if our leg bones melted we would fall to
the ground. So the Administration is saying the 20,000 gallons
of kerosene, jet fuel, and the other plane had something like
4000 gallons of jet fuel on board when it hit the tower which
makes the idea it melted the beams totally illogical, melted
approximately 80,000 feet of giant I beams. Remember these
beams are encased in concrete and some of the I beams were
at least 600 feet from the blast. The small container of lighter
fluid like we use to start a charcoal fire to bar- b- que
a steak on the grill generates about the same amount of heat
as a quart of jet fuel. We are expected to believe a quart
of jet fuel heated a running foot of giant I beam to the point
that the I beam melted. Good try zioni$t communi$t$, I don't
think your blair holds up under scientific examination. We
are being lied to. The jet plane did not bring down the giant
building. Something had to have been exploded inside the building
which generated enough heat to melt 80,000 feet of giant I-
beam steel. Like a nuclear bomb. This is why firefighters
and people in New York are sick and expectant mothers Sept.
11, 2001 delivered deformed babies. Pee Dee Wolfowiz is blairing
this situation because it means the case for war is BS, and
the 37,000 Iraqi already killed are the result of his calculated
crimes against humanity and he does not want to get indicted
for treason because he fears he will get convicted and get
the needle and he likes doing wrong but he is a coward and
does not want to get caught and punished. We punish Dahlmer
types why should Americans look the other way and let zioni$t
communi$t$ send our fine soldiers to their deaths and do all
their other Safire New York times types dirty deeds just because
they are hate filled racists who want the world in their septic
tank.
10-08-03
Shock and Awe in
the Moussaoui Case
Judge Brinkema Drops a Bomb
Judge Leonie Brinkema dropped a bomb on Thursday. Showing
independence from the government and the defense, Brinkema
announced the penalty for prosecutors' refusal to produce
three witnesses for Zacarias Moussaoui and his attorneys to
question. She did not dismiss the case, but took the death
penalty off the table.
What she had seen of the government's evidence so far suggested that Moussaoui had done, at worst, little more than plan to do something bad. Perhaps he was involved in some scheming, but that alone would not warrant a death penalty.
Moussaoui an enemy combatant and move him to Guantanamo or a navy prison if the case is dismissed (they may still do it, for the government makes up its enemy combatant rules as it goes along). They would no longer have a client if he disappeared from federal court. His only chance of getting a fair trial is in federal court.
In keeping the case and taking the needle out of the hands of the prosecutors, Brinkema has put them in a bind. The only thing they have to scream about now is that they can't kill the defendant. The case can go forward.
Indeed, Brinkema said, it must go forward. She noted that all along the government has insisted that "terrorists" can be tried in federal court. They can, she said, but they will get the rights any federal court defendant gets. Further, she said, she and everyone else had spent way too much time, money, and energy on this case to walk away from it.
The 4th Circuit will have a hard time overturning Judge Brinkema's ruling. Trial judges have wide latitude in dealing with discovery sanctions and with making evidentiary decisions. Of course, the 4th Circuit has been known to reach before_they did it recently in the Hamdi case, in saying that no court can question a person's enemy combatant status. But if they reverse her ruling that Moussaoui cannot face execution, the court, Ashcroft, and the prosecutors will look the bloodthirsty henchmen that they are.
They wanted to gloss over the trail part, and march straight to the execution chamber. Now, they will have to endure a trial and be content with less than death. Unless, of course, a military helicopter swoops down in Alexandria and hauls Moussaoui away in the dead of night. I wouldn't put that past the prosecutors, but such a move would be so obviously done to avoid the rule of law, that few but the most stalwart of Ashcroft supporters would defend such an action.
I heard Judge Brinkema give a brief talk at a recent attorney gathering. She talked about how times had changed since she first came to federal court in Alexandria 20 or so years ago, then as a prosecutor. She urged attendees to go to the National Archives and stand in awe of the new exhibit_the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights displayed all in one room, with the entire documents visible for viewing. We are nothing as a nation, she said, without the rule of law. She called on prosecutors to try cases within the law and for defense attorneys to hold the prosecutors to the law. She said nothing of her role. But we saw it yesterday.
She judges according to the law. Ironic, though, that her applying the rule of law to a Muslim "terrorist" is a shock to what we have grown to expect in trials post-September 11. And thus, all the more awe-inspiring.
Elaine Cassel practices law in Virginia and the District of Columbia, teachers law and psychology, and follows the Bush regime's dismantling of the Constitution at Civil Liberties Watch.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Why is this ruling such a big deal? Big George, Pee Dee Wolfowiz want Moussaoui dead, dead, dead, because Moussaoui supplied the real zioni$t communi$t$ behind September 11 their Arab patsies. If Moussaoui is not killed his mouth could blow the whistle on the real planner of September 11, Wolfowiz and garbage, and this would stop their conquer the world, kill every American fine solder, overthrown America, evil dead in its tracks, and the war criminal cowards would be laughed at as they twitch getting the needle, as they should. Treasonous blank, blank, blank. Pee Dee the world is going to watch your treasonous war against humanity coward _ss twitch fair and square and laugh and cheer.
Why do you think the Administration brought the death penalty out of the cellar for McVeigh? They feared McVeigh would one day blow the whistle on the real clandestine forces behind Oklahoma City.
9-22-03
And I thought the mentally ill shoe bomber, Richard Reid looked so dumb he would not get out of the rain. This guy looks almost as dumb as Richard Reid and the Administration is trying to sell us on the idea he is the mastermind behind Sept. 11. I would hate to guess how many years' of training and expertise went in to the real planning of Sept. 11. A 1000 years of engineering experience, a 100 years of computer expertise, a 100 years of airport security experience, on, and on, and on. Did he graduate from the University of Chicago top in his class? Is is fluent in English? No one believes this guy masterminded Sept. 11. Only a nitwit like comrade Pee Dee Wolfowiz would even try to sell this BS fraud on the world. Maybe the war criminal thugs below masterminded Sept. 11,
but not this Mohammed guy. Nuclear bombs had to be planted in the buildings because all kinds of firemen are sick as can be who worked on the clean-up effort, the steal beams melted, and only a nuclear bomb could generate the heat necessary to bring down a World Trade Tower. Who hates free trade and believes in a communi$t economy? Big George's zioni$t communi$t New World Order and a few of the communi$t$' "useful idiots" are pictured above. The planes were flown by remote control. Sept. 11 was/is high tech terrorism. Lies. Blair. BS. No. No. The signature of real Arab terrorism is a screw-up. Like the Richard Reid shoe bomb deal and Reid was so mentally ill he was obviously manipulated. You have to have high tech and have the heart of a racist to pull off Sept. 11, and the zioni$t communi$t$ have puss hearts, they are racists, they are traitors and want the USA overthrown, zioni$t$ want our fine soldiers killed, and the communi$t$ have the technology, "means" and the guy above obviously does not means or the brains. Pee Dee I know you think you are so smart.
But do you know Pee Dee why the al-Queda is absolutely not helping you with your terrorism? You killed bin Laden and Omar. The brains and leaders are dead. Your terrorist arm has been cut off and you have to do all the terrorism yourself. You are getting caught blowing up mosques and doing all the horrible deeds you are doing because the terrorism has your signature, and not the signature of true Arab terrorists. Only a very stupid person would try to sell this Mohammad guy as brains behind Sept. 11.
Saturday, August
23, 2003
White House edited EPA's 9/11 reports
By JOHN HEILPRIN
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON -- At the White House's direction, the Environmental Protection Agency gave New Yorkers misleading assurances that there was no health risk from the debris-laden air after the World Trade Center collapse, according to an internal inquiry.
President Bush's senior environmental adviser yesterday defended the White House involvement, saying it was justified by national security. (Big George's New World Order placed nuclear bombs in buildings and Big George and his band of zioni$t communi$t treasonous conspirators do not want to get the needle.)
The White House "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones" by having the National Security Council (a zioni$t communi$t controlled organization) control EPA communications after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, according to a report issued late Thursday by EPA Inspector General Nikki Tinsley.
"When EPA made a Sept. 18 announcement that the air was 'safe' to breathe, the agency did not have sufficient data and analyses to make the statement," the report says, adding that the EPA had yet to adequately monitor air quality for contaminants such as PCBs, soot and dioxin.
In all, the EPA issued five news releases within 10 days of the attacks and four more by the end of 2001 reassuring the public about air quality. But it wasn't until June 2002 that the EPA determined that air quality had returned to pre-Sept. 11 levels -- well after respiratory ailments and other problems began to surface in hundreds of workers cleaning dusty offices and apartments.
The day after the attacks, former EPA Deputy Administrator Linda Fisher's chief of staff e-mailed senior EPA officials to say that "all statements to the media should be cleared" first by the National Security Council, which is Bush's main forum for discussing national security and foreign policy matters with his senior aides and Cabinet, the inspector general's report says.
Approval from the NSC, the report says, was arranged through the White House Council on Environmental Quality, which "influenced, through the collaboration process, the information that EPA communicated to the public through its early press releases when it convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones."
For example, the inspector general found, the EPA was persuaded to omit guidance for cleaning indoor spaces and tips on potential health effects from airborne dust containing asbestos, lead, glass fibers and concrete.
James Connaughton,
chairman of the environmental council, which coordinates federal
environmental efforts, said the White House directed the EPA
to add and delete information based on how it should be released
publicly.
He said the EPA did "an incredible job" with the
World Trade Center cleanup.
Andy Darrell, New York regional director of Environmental Defense, an advocacy group, said the report is indicative of a pattern of White House interference in EPA affairs.
"For EPA to do its job well, it needs to be allowed to make decisions based on the science and the facts," he said.
The EPA inspector general recommended the EPA adopt new procedures so its public statements on health risks and environmental quality are backed by data and analysis.
Other recommendations include developing better procedures for indoor air cleanups and asbestos handling in large-scale disasters.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I wrote the following Sept. 29, 2001 or earlier
It is my guess
the government will totally suppress and news of people being
injured from the World Trade Buildings blasts. Animals, roaches,
rats, water pollution, and even fish will start coming out
of their hiding places and die in front of people. Will we
hear about animals just dying? No. The entire mess will be
ignored in a governmental cover-up scheme. Actually we are
living in a holocaust. Jews knew their families were being
killed and no one believed them. The exact same mess has got
to be going on now in New York City. All I can say is I told
you so about Little George. I knew he was going to place the
world at war but I had no idea it would be this bad or that
it happen like this.
August 6, 2003 Newspaper headline "WTC dust linked to small babies"
Expectant mothers who were in New York City Sept. 11 and finding out their babies are deformed and have health problems including unusually small size, heart disease, and other mysterious diseases. The New York times type media and their evil Hitler style propaganda departments are blairing, lying about the truth on this health issue to cover the fact they are raci$t conspirators working to kill Christian kids in the military and the overthrow of the USA, and the zioni$t$ are blaming the deformed babies on dust. Wolfowiz zioni$t communi$t propaganda cover-up & lies. There were nuclear bombs in the buildings the communi$t$ detonated when the planes, flown by remote control, crashed in to the buildings and the bomb's radiation is causing the health defects, and not dust. Another bit of proof the Big George's communi$t New World Order are responsible for Sept. 11, 2001.
Full Coverage of the zioni$t$ 911 Conspiracy